| 18-12 |
Joseph A. Kennedy v. Bremerton School District |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (7)Relisted (12) |
coaches constitutional-rights employment-rights establishment-clause first-amendment free-speech public-employment public-forum public-school religious-expression school-speech teachers tinker-v-des-moines |
Whether public school teachers and coaches retain any First Amendment rights when at work and "in the general presence of" students. |
23.0 |
| 18-500 |
The First Presbyterian Church U. S. A. of Tulsa, Oklahoma, et al. v. John Doe |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
affirmative-defense church-discipline church-doctrine church-government church-member-disputes consent consent-based first-amendment jurisdiction jurisdictional-doctrine membership membership-dispute religious-autonomy |
1. Whether the religious autonomy doctrine derives from the First Amendment or rather is a consent-based doctrine applicable only to disputes between … |
13.5 |
| 18-676 |
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Ryan Karnoski, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (2)Relisted (2) |
due-process equal-protection first-amendment gender-dysphoria military-service military-service-policy transgender transgender-individuals transgender-policy |
Whether the district court erred in preliminarily enjoining the military from implementing the Mattis policy nationwide. |
13.0 |
| 18-677 |
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Jane Doe 2, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
constitutional-challenge due-process equal-protection gender-dysphoria military-policy military-service preliminary-injunction transgender transgender-military-service |
In 2018, Secretary of Defense James Mattis announced a new policy concerning military service by transgender individuals. Under the Mattis policy, tra… |
11.0 |
| 18-678 |
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Aiden Stockman, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process equal-protection gender-dysphoria military military-policy military-service preliminary-injunction standing transgender transgender-military-service transgender-policy |
Whether the district court erred in preliminarily enjoining the military from implementing the Mattis policy nationwide. |
11.0 |
| 18-506 |
Dawn L. Hassell, et al. v. Yelp, Inc. |
California |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
communications-decency-act injunction interactive-computer-services non-party non-party-liability section-230 tortious-content unprotected-content unprotected-speech |
Whether Section 230 of the Communications
Decency Act, 47 U.S.C. § 230 et seq., which precludes
holding certain interactive computer services "liable"… |
9.0 |
| 18-561 |
Orus Ashby Berkley, et al. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
15-usc-717r administrative-review administrative-review-scheme agency-action agency-order congressional-delegation constitutional-challenge delegation-of-power district-court district-court-jurisdiction non-delegation-doctrine separation-of-powers |
I. Is a delegation of Congressional power an "agency
order" or "agency action" such that a party wishing
to challenge that delegation must file that c… |
6.5 |
| 18-344 |
Linda Shao v. McManis Faulkner, LLP |
California |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
access-to-courts american-inns-of-court attorney-client-relationship civil-procedure conflict-of-interest conflicts-of-interest court-of-appeal due-process judge-disclosure judicial-ethics recusal right-to-appeal social-relationship |
Does due process require reversal of the dismissals as Presiding Justice Mary J. Greenwood failed to recuse or disclose her conflicts of interests?
I… |
6.0 |
| 18-475 |
Zaremba Family Farms, Inc., et al. v. Encana Oil & Gas (USA) Inc. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
anticompetitive-agreement antitrust antitrust-injury civil-procedure civil-rights due-process injury-in-fact market-allocation oil-and-gas oil-and-gas-rights private-cause-of-action standing takings valuation |
Whether proof of the fact of damage—a significant drop in the value of a plaintiffs oil and gas interests—because of an illegal, anticompetitive agree… |
6.0 |
| 18-615 |
Bruce Munro, et al. v. Lucy Activewear Inc., et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
|
circuit-split civil-procedure copyright copyright-law intellectual-property lanham-act physical-products preemption product-design standing trade-dress |
Does copyright preclude Lanham Act product design trade dress claims for physical products, and if so, under what circumstance(s)? |
5.5 |
| 18-618 |
Dolores Gutierrez, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
|
arbitration civil-procedure class-action dispute-resolution due-process efficient-dispute-resolution federal-arbitration-act litigation-tactics procedural-strategy standing |
Is the Federal Arbitration Act's goal of "providing efficient
streamlined procedures tailored to the type of dispute,"
AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcio… |
5.5 |
| 18-628 |
Rebekah Cooper, as Administrator of the Estate of Jason Cooper, Deceased v. Ehtsham Haq, et al. |
Alabama |
Denied |
|
civil-procedure federal-question medical-malpractice state-law-claims statute-of-limitations supplemental-jurisdiction tolling tolling-provision wrongful-death |
Are the state-law periods of limitation for Alabama wrongful-death and medical-malpractice claims immune from the tolling provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 13… |
5.5 |
| 18-634 |
Aed El-Saba v. University of South Alabama |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
|
appellate-review civil-procedure employment-discrimination national-origin-discrimination pretext pretext-analysis retaliation summary-judgment supervisory-power termination |
Under Rule 10(a) when the trial court changes the language of the stated discharge reason; substitutes another document as the focus of pretext analys… |
5.5 |
| 18-636 |
The Pure Presbyterian Church of Washington, et al. v. The Grace of God Presbyterian Church |
Virginia |
Dismissed |
|
church-property civil-procedure constitutional-competence ecclesiastical-abstention establishment-clause first-amendment free-exercise merger-analysis neutral-principles religious-freedom religious-organizations subject-matter-jurisdiction |
The trial court entered its Final Order disposing, inter alia, of Church Property, predicated upon a judicial determination that Grace Presbyterian wa… |
5.5 |
| 18-646 |
Marquette Transportation Company, L.L.C., et al. v. Entergy Mississippi, Incorporated |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
|
admiralty admiralty-law comparative-fault maritime-law navigable-waters permit-compliance prejudgment-interest property-interest rivers-and-harbors-act takings tort-action |
Land-based decisions in the takings context mandate permit compliance as a threshold for a plaintiff to have a compensable property interest. For the … |
5.5 |
| 18-647 |
Pulte Homes of New York LLC v. Town of Carmel, New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
|
42-usc-1983 civil-rights continuing-violation land-development-fees municipal-government municipal-liability section-1983 statute-of-limitations |
Whether a civil rights claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 accrues by a continuing violation theory when a municipality refuses, or attempts to condition, th… |
5.5 |
| 18-660 |
Kenneth J. Taggart v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
|
carpenter-v-longan due-process federal-home-loan-mortgage-corporation federal-jurisdiction federal-preemption federal-removal freddie-mac mortgage note property-rights real-estate security-interest standing state-court-action |
1. Has the authority of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) to remove state court actions to federal court, pursuant to 12 U.S.C.… |
5.5 |
| 18-665 |
James Michael Alvis v. Leland W. Schilling |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
|
14th-amendment child-custody civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment fourteenth-amendment judicial-immunity state-court-action state-law |
1. Whether Respondent, a state court judge, was entitled to judicial immunity when he took action in a child custody matter in contravention of state … |
5.5 |
| 18A669 |
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena |
District of Columbia |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 18M89 |
Edgar Baltazar Garcia v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 18M90 |
Nicholas Harris v. Linda Fuller |
California |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 18M93 |
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena |
District of Columbia |
Presumed Complete |
|
None |
|
5.5 |
| 18-5548 |
Brian Tuttle v. Allied Nevada Gold Corp., et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review article-iii-courts bankruptcy-appeals bankruptcy-courts bankruptcy-jurisdiction bankruptcy-law constitutional-rights equitable-mootness judicial-doctrine statutory-interpretation |
Whether Article III courts can refuse to exercise appellate jurisdiction assigned to them by Congress over final decisions of non-Article III bankrupt… |
4.5 |
| 18-630 |
Charles Allen Richards v. City of Des Moines Police Department, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech legal-clinic police-department retaliation standing |
1. Did Charles Richards exercise a right protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States when he approached the legal clinic… |
3.5 |
| 18-655 |
Craig J. Spitzer v. Trisha A. Aljoe, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
abuse-of-discretion attorney-misconduct barton-doctrine civil-procedure civil-procedure-discovery-sanctions-public-entity- discovery discovery-sanctions discretionary-review frcp-26 public-entity sanctions section-1983 state-court-receiver |
Does a district court have a duty under FRCP 26(g)(3) to sanction public entities and their attorneys for improper withholding of documents requested … |
3.5 |
| 18-662 |
Mary McDonald v. City of Wichita, Kansas |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
adverse-action but-for-causation but-for-cause employment-discrimination jury-instruction jury-instructions predominant-cause retaliation sole-cause sole-cause-standard standard-of-proof title-vii |
The plaintiff in a Title VII retaliation case must "establish that his or her protected activity was a but for cause of the alleged adverse action by … |
3.5 |
| 18-764 |
Oscar Henry Steinmetz v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
4th-amendment civil-rights consent consent-search constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fourth-amendment law-enforcement probable-cause search-and-seizure |
1. Does the law regarding searches, seizures, and consent need clarification for proper guidance and application?
2. Should a law enforcement officer… |
3.5 |
| 18-6378 |
Robert Ira Peede v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
arbitrary-cutoff capital-murder capital-punishment death-penalty death-penalty-retroactivity due-process eighth-amendment evolving-standards-of-decency fourteenth-amendment hurst-v-florida jury-unanimity retroactivity |
1. Whether the Florida Supreme Court's partial retroactivity rule as to violations pursuant to Hurst v. Florida, which is based on an arbitrary cutoff… |
0.5 |
| 18-5694 |
Taumu James v. Debbie Asuncion, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-2254 circuit-court clearly-established-federal-law due-process fair-application federal-law habeas-corpus identification-evidence state-suggestion |
1. In Perry v. New Hampshire , 565 U.S. 228 (2012), this Court held that the right to due process is generally not denied by identification evidence u… |
-1.0 |
| 18-5707 |
Anthony Curtis Flowers v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Dismissed |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
3-strikes armed-career-criminal-act career-offender due-process due-process,johnson-v-united-states,18-usc-924,18- habeas-corpus johnson-ruling johnson-v-united-states section-2255 sentencing sentencing-guidelines |
(1) Whether the district court deprived Flowers due process by denying his
§ 2255 petition challenging his sentences under Johnson v. United States, 1… |
-1.0 |
| 18-5760 |
William Benjamin Brown v. Andrew Mansukhani, Warden |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
abuse-of-discretion administrative-law appellate-review civil-procedure constitutional-provisions due-process jurisdiction standing |
Did the District Court Abuse its Discretion By Not Addressing the Court Order?
Did the Respondent Violate Rule 5 by not answering the Court Order?
D… |
-1.0 |
| 18-6097 |
Leonard G. Marquez v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
armed-career-criminal-act burglary burglary-definition circuit-split mens-rea predicate-offense sentencing sentencing-enhancement tenth-circuit violent-felony |
I. Did the Tenth Circuit determine a New Mexico residential burglary is "burglary" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii) in a way that contravenes this C… |
-1.0 |
| 18-7072 |
Kenneth Harper v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process guilty-plea harmless-error judicial-error plea-bargaining plea-colloquy rule-11 sentencing-guidelines |
Has United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55 (2005), and its progeny stripped the Courts of Appeal of the ability to meaningfully supervise the plea colloqu… |
-1.5 |
| 18-7077 |
JC Christopher Pulham v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review district-court legal-standard plain-error plain-error-review presumption presumption-of-correctness presumption-of-knowledge sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review |
When a district court does not articulate the legal standard it is applying, may an appellate court presume that the district court knew and correctly… |
-1.5 |
| 18-5420 |
Tyler T. Heagy v. Pennsylvania |
Pennsylvania |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
appeal-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process filing-restrictions habeas-corpus post-conviction-relief procedural-due-process right-to-appeal right-to-counsel standing statutory-interpretation unconstitutional-as-applied |
Was 42 Pa.C.S.A. §9543 (a)(1)(i) unconstitutional as applied to Petitioners case?
Were 42 Pa.C.S.A. §9545 (b) and (c) unconstitutional as applied to … |
-4.0 |
| 18-5569 |
Sean Weisner v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-2244 circuit-split civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process federal-habeas federal-statute habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mandate-rule mental-illness standing time-bar |
1) Does the Classification made by this Court in Coley d. Sattald Jan 8.64. 3134 constitute the Circuit Court as being contrary to Clearly established… |
-4.0 |
| 18-6048 |
In Re Daniel A. Spottsville |
|
Dismissed |
Relisted (2)IFP |
antiterrorism-and-effective-death-penalty-act civil-procedure civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction standing takings |
Qustionis, as a staterprisoner does Afiant Spottuillehane vested, tinding Constitutionep sight to file a 28 uscs 5 224 petition in the dostrict court … |
-4.0 |
| 18-5965 |
Rayburn Scott Harmon v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
bodily-injury castleman-standard civil-rights criminal-law due-process felony-force-clause misdemeanor-force-clause statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent united-states-v-castleman violent-act violent-felonies violent-felony violent-force violent-physical-force |
Whether the mere causation of bodily injury necessarily includes the use of violent, physical force. |
-4.5 |
| 18-6062 |
Ramiro Rubi Ibarra v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equitable-exception final-conviction habeas-corpus martinez-exception martinez-v-ryan procedural-default retroactive-rights retroactivity |
1. Could reasonable jurists debate whether the equitable exception to procedural default recognized in Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012), should be … |
-4.5 |
| 18-6330 |
Jose Arnaldo Rodrigues v. Ron Davis, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process evidentiary-hearing fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment standing |
Whether federal habeas review of a silent state court denial of
competency-related habeas claims must consider the state court's
appellate opinion on … |
-4.5 |
| 18-6375 |
Michael Whisby v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
armed-career-criminal-act career-offender-provision collateral-review mandatory-guidelines pre-booker-mandatory-guidelines pre-booker-sentencing retroactivity sentencing-guidelines sentencing-guidelines-vagueness stokeling-v-united-states vagueness-doctrine violent-felony |
1. Whether U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2)'s residual clause is void for vagueness vis-a-vis defendants sentenced under the pre-Booker mandatory Guidelines.
2… |
-4.5 |
| 18-6684 |
Arika Matelyan v. Fox 11 |
Ninth Circuit |
Dismissed |
IFP |
access-to-justice civil-procedure civil-rights discrimination due-process equal-protection free-speech standing |
Why do't the highest coort in the land put copy right to Conbent
I would like to ask wny dont the supeme count go by the law and follow wnat the lowe… |
-4.5 |
| 18-6708 |
Clifford D. Williams v. Ohio |
Ohio |
Denied |
IFP |
capital-punishment death-penalty eighth-amendment judge-sentencing jury-trial jury-verdict sentencing-phase sixth-amendment spaziano-v-florida |
Is Ohio's death penalty scheme unconstitutional under Hurst v. Florida? |
-4.5 |
| 18-6722 |
Craig Porter v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process jurisdiction speedy-trial statutory-interpretation |
DID THE FIRST COURT OF APPEALS ERRONEOUSOY AFFIRMED APPLICANT'S CONVECTION BASED ON STATE PROSECUTION'S ARGUMENTS WETH ROGARDS TO APPLICANT'S REGAT TO… |
-4.5 |
| 18-6735 |
Perry Alexander Taylor v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
caldwell-v-mississippi death-penalty eighth-amendment equal-protection flawed-scientific-testimony hurst-retroactivity medical-examiner-testimony non-unanimous-jury retroactivity |
Perry Alexander Taylor was denied relief under Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016) in the State of Florida because his case was one of many that b… |
-4.5 |
| 18-6736 |
James E. Whitney v. Cindy Glover, Clerk, Circuit Court of Lincoln County, Arkansas, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
Dismissed |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection first-amendment free-speech religious-freedom standing |
Should and Individuals secured and protected Constitutional Right under the First Amendment to redress the Government for wrongs perpetuated against t… |
-4.5 |
| 18-6744 |
Wesley Wayne Schaefer v. Lorie Davis, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Criminal Institutions Division |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
consequences criminal-procedure de-novo-review double-jeopardy double-jeopardy,lesser-included-offense,state-law, due-process due-process,criminal-procedure,plea-bargaining,eff due-process,equal-protection,fourteenth-amendment, due-process,grand-jury,fifth-amendment,fourteenth- effective-assistance-of-counsel,plea-bargaining,du federal-courts,state-courts,de-novo-review,mixed-q grand-jury guilty-plea ineffective-assistance jury-unanimity plea-bargaining silent-record sixth-amendment,jury-trial,unanimous-verdict,due-p |
Whether a Court may assume, from a silent record, the defendant was sufficiently made aware of the consequences of his guilty plea?
Whether the Unite… |
-4.5 |
| 18-6745 |
In Re Donald L. Spencer |
|
Denied |
IFP |
aedpa antiterrorism-and-effective-death-penalty-act district-court-judge due-process federal-court federal-courts federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus statute-of-limitations tolling-provision |
A.)
Whether the Honorable Richard Williams, U.s. District Court
Judge has a clear duty to afford Petitioner the full one-year
statute period from the … |
-4.5 |
| 18-6749 |
James Barnes v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-violation criminal-procedure faretta-right faretta-v-california mitigation mitigation-investigation presentencing-investigation pro-se-defendant sixth-amendment special-counsel |
Whether Florida's use of "special counsel" to investigate and present mitigation and its requirement of a presentencing investigation report to provid… |
-4.5 |
| 18-6762 |
Edward Louis Thomas v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
IFP |
criminal-procedure cumulative-error due-process habeas-corpus harrington-v-richter hinton-v-alabama ineffective-assistance-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prejudice standard-of-review strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
DID THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLY THE WRONG STANDARD OF REVIEW IN ANALYZING THE CLAIM OF DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE BY TRIAL COUNSEL?
DID THE … |
-4.5 |
| 18-6769 |
Kenneth G. Middleton v. Ronda Pash, Superintendent, Crossroads Correctional Center |
Missouri |
Denied |
IFP |
actual-innocence constitutional-rights due-process eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-proceedings post-conviction-relief |
1. Whether the continued incarceration of a state prisoner who has presented a truly persuasive case of actual innocence violates the Eighth and Fourt… |
-4.5 |
| 18-6785 |
Christopher Scott v. Illinois |
Illinois |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-law criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus statutory-interpretation |
1st degree murder charges Count 23.
Whether Petitoner
PriNt, while Also Killed in the Course of Another Felny"
5/18-2 & 5/19-3, Violated the Joiner of… |
-4.5 |
| 18-6786 |
Curtis J. Hill v. Joe A. Lizarraga, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
cause-of-death confrontation-clause due-process evidence expert-reports expert-testimony habeas-corpus medical-evidence pro-se pro-se-filing unreasonable-determination unreasonable-factual-findings |
1. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(2) did the California Court of Appeal unreasonably determine the facts critical to a proper Confrontation Clause analysis… |
-4.5 |
| 18-6788 |
Rhett Bean v. Israel Hamilton, Warden |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel miscarriage-of-justice presumption-of-innocence |
FOR the purpose of U.s.c.A 2253(c), is it debatable that wrongly excluded evidence
MAy be used to Rebut the presumption of guilt for A cRimivial convi… |
-4.5 |
| 18-6843 |
James Milton Dailey v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
capital-punishment death-penalty eighth-amendment equal-protection fourteenth-amendment hurst-error hurst-v-florida retroactivity ring-v-arizona supremacy-clause |
1. Does the Florida Supreme Court's partial retro activity decision, which lim its the class of deathsentenced individuals entitled to a jury de termi… |
-4.5 |
| 18-6882 |
Willie Seth Crain, Jr. v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
remedies prior constitutional defects in capital which requires unanimous jury findings of aggrava advisory-sentencing-panel aggravating-circumstances caldwell-v-mississippi capital-sentencing civil-rights constitutional-error death-penalty death-penalty-sentencing due-process harmless-error Hurst-decision hurst-v-florida jury-instructions jury-role jury-unanimity mitigating-circumstances sentencing sentencing-procedure |
On remand from the Florida Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. Florida, the Florida Supreme Court held, as a state constitutional consequence, that a… |
-4.5 |
| 18-6889 |
Stephen Todd Booker v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
apprendi-v-new-jersey criminal-procedure death-penalty death-penalty-sentencing eighth-amendment equal-protection fourteenth-amendment hurst-retroactivity montgomery-v-louisiana retroactivity |
1. Does the partial retroactivity formula for Hurst v. Florida, 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), claims designed by the Florida Supreme Court, as applied to a p… |
-4.5 |
| 18-6650 |
Imran Duplessis-Jean, aka Irman Jean Duplessis, aka Imran Jean, aka Irman Jean v. Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
None |
|
-6.5 |
| 18-6790 |
Clarence Otworth v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law appeal appeals civil-procedure constitutional-rights equal-protection federal-jurisdiction final-order jurisdiction notice-of-appeal oath-of-office presidential-nonfeasance standing |
I. Is an appeal of a final order and a notice of appeal the same thing?
Did Judge Cooper have the authority to send plaintiff's dismissed case to a c… |
-6.5 |
| 18-6825 |
In Re Alonzo Dean Shephard |
|
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection patent standing takings |
Question not identified. |
-6.5 |
| 18-6832 |
Keddron Rakee West v. Georgia |
Georgia |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-law criminal-defense criminal-procedure due-process indictment mens-rea mistake-of-fact statutory-interpretation statutory-rape |
Is due process violated by not allowing Petitioner to rely upon the statutory enacted mistake of fact defense as his sole defense to an indictment for… |
-6.5 |
| 18-6868 |
In Re Peter T. Roukis |
|
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
Article-12 bureau-of-prisons civil-rights custody discharged-prisoners due-process legal-custody military-prisoners uniform-code-of-military-justice |
Are discharged military prisoners confined within the Bureau
Of Prisons subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (ucmJ)?
Does Article 12, UCMJ… |
-6.5 |
| 18-6880 |
Jason A. Lenz v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
accidental-death character-evidence civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process expert-testimony habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance jury-deadlock standing statutory-interpretation |
Should a certificate of appealability issue in a Section 2254 proceeding where counsel learned directly from a juror that the jury had deadlocked 10-2… |
-6.5 |
| 18-6973 |
Andy Edward Minor v. Mississippi |
Mississippi |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment civil-rights due-process equal-protection habeas-corpus prisoner-rights racial-discrimination school-desegregation standing state-court-appeals |
A.oo
SHOULD MINOR'S
CONVICTION BE VACATED
AND SENTENCE SET ASIDE DUE TO HIS
ACTUAL INNOCENCE?
PeTiTioner says Yes!
B..
SHOULD MINOR'S
CONVICTION BE V… |
-6.5 |
| 18-7048 |
Jimmy Lawrence Nance v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Dismissed |
Response WaivedIFP |
buck-v-davis certificate-of-appealability constitutional-rights due-process extraordinary-circumstances fourth-circuit habeas-corpus slack-v-mcdaniel |
WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY BY FAILING TO ASSES THE EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES PRESEN… |
-6.5 |
| 18-7078 |
Joseph O'Shaughnessy, aka Joseph D. O'Shaughnessy v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review appellate-waiver criminal-procedure due-process involuntary-plea judicial-review ninth-circuit-procedure plea-bargaining plea-voluntariness voluntariness waiver |
The petitioner (criminal defendant below) claimed that his plea was involuntary, so therefore his appellate waiver was involuntary. The District Court… |
-6.5 |
| 18-7079 |
Franklyn Morillo v. United States |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
abuse-of-discretion appellate-waiver certiorari controlled-substances criminal-procedure district-court due-process first-impression first-impression' 'Should certiorari be granted i judicial-discretion knowing-intelligent-voluntary legal-standard plea-bargaining procedural-rights role-enhancement sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review' 'Should certiorari be granted |
1. Should certiorari be granted to decide whether a district court can only ask a Petitioner a single question about an appellate waiver, even though … |
-6.5 |
| 18-7108 |
Timothy Gene Pryer v. Thomas Gardner, III |
Mississippi |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-limits criminal-acts due-process judicial-discretion judicial-immunity judicial-misconduct sovereign-immunity standing takings |
Does the Constitution grant judges jurisdiction to commit criminal acts by way of judicial decisions?
Does the Constitution support absolute immunity… |
-6.5 |
| 18-7138 |
Antonio Alvarez-Moreno v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-vagueness criminal-procedure due-process firearms law-enforcement-notification sentencing-guidelines supervised-release vagueness weapon-possession |
Are these conditions unconstitutionally vague? |
-6.5 |
| 18-7144 |
Rodney Russell v. United States |
First Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
batson-challenge batson-v-kentucky civil-rights criminal-procedure-peremptory-challenges due-process fourteenth-amendment jury-selection peremptory-strike powers-v-ohio racial-discrimination standing |
I. Whether a district court has an obligation to inquire of the prosecution as to the substance behind their stated reasons as to why they used a pere… |
-6.5 |
| 18-7156 |
Antonez Terril Johnson v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
arrest federal-circuit-split fourth-amendment investigative-detention investigatory-stop investigatory-stops pedestrian-stop probable-cause reasonableness-standard scope-and-duration terry-stop terry-v-ohio |
This Court has held, in several traffic stop cases, that investigatory stops based on probable cause can violate the Fourth Amendment in scope and dur… |
-6.5 |