No. 18-678

Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Aiden Stockman, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process equal-protection gender-dysphoria military military-policy military-service preliminary-injunction standing transgender transgender-military-service transgender-policy
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Environmental DueProcess FifthAmendment FirstAmendment Takings Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-01-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court erred in preliminarily enjoining the military from implementing the Mattis policy nationwide

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED In 2018, Secretary of Defense James Mattis announced a new policy concerning military service by transgender individuals. Under the Mattis policy, transgender individuals would be permitted to serve in the military, while individuals with a history of a medical condition called gender dysphoria would be disqualified from military service unless they meet certain conditions. The question presented is: Whether the district court erred in preliminarily enjoining the military from implementing the Mattis policy nationwide. (I)

Docket Entries

2019-01-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-22
Application (18A627) referred to the Court.
2019-01-22
Application (18A627) granted by the Court. The application for stay presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court is granted, and the District Court’s December 22, 2017 order granting a preliminary injunction is stayed pending disposition of the Government’s appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the Government’s petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is sought. If a writ of certiorari is sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for a writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment. Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan would deny the application.
2019-01-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.
2019-01-04
Reply of applicant Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed.
2018-12-28
Response to application from respondents Aiden Stockman, et al. filed.
2018-12-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-12-24
Brief of respondents Aiden Stockman, et al. in opposition filed.
2018-12-21
Letter of respondent State of California filed.
2018-12-13
Response to application (18A627) requested by Justice Kagan, due Friday, December 28, 2018, by noon ET.
2018-12-13
Application (18A627) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan.
2018-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 24, 2018)

Attorneys

Aiden Stockman, et al.
J. Scott BallengerLatham & Watkins, Respondent
J. Scott BallengerLatham & Watkins, Respondent
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Petitioner
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Petitioner
Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund
Lawrence J. JosephLaw Office of Lawrence J. Joseph, Amicus
Lawrence J. JosephLaw Office of Lawrence J. Joseph, Amicus
State of California
Aimee Athena FeinbergCalifornia Department of Justice, Respondent
Aimee Athena FeinbergCalifornia Department of Justice, Respondent