| 24-99 |
Dale Folwell, State Treasurer of North Carolina, et al. v. Maxwell Kadel, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-07-30 |
GVR |
Amici (3)Relisted (2) |
equal-protection gender-discrimination gender-dysphoria healthcare-exclusion medical-coverage sex-based-classification sex-discrimination state-health-plans transgender-rights |
Whether a State's decision to decline to provide health benefit coverage for treatments leading to sex changes violates the Equal Protection Clause |
| 24-90 |
William Crouch, in His Official Capacity as Cabinet Secretary of the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources, et al. v. Shauntae Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-07-29 |
GVR |
Amici (3)Relisted (2) |
affordable-care-act equal-protection gender-dysphoria medicaid-act medical-coverage non-discrimination sex-discrimination transgender-status |
Whether West Virginia violated the Equal Protection Clause by declining to cover surgical treatments for gender dysphoria |
| 22-633 |
Stacey A. Kincaid, Sheriff, Fairfax County, Virginia v. Kesha T. Williams |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-01-09 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (9) |
42-usc-12211 ada-title-ii americans-with-disabilities-act disability-definition disability-rights dsm-5 fourth-circuit gender-dysphoria statutory-interpretation |
Whether the diagnosis of gender dysphoria, found in the DSM-5, is excluded from the ADA's definition of disability under 42 U.S.C. § 12211(b) |
| 20-1553 |
Reiyn Keohane v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-05-07 |
Denied |
|
appellate-procedure civil-rights due-process gender-dysphoria mootness munsingwear-doctrine standing vacatur |
Whether, pursuant to United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950), the court of appeals' judgment should be vacated where the FDC, after pre… |
| 20-5521 |
Wilbert Williams, aka Serenity Izabel Williams v. Beverly Kelly, Assistant Warden, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-08-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
8th-amendment civil-rights conflict-of-interest due-process eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment gender-dysphoria medical-treatment prisoners-rights transgender transgender-rights |
Whether gender dysphoria is a serious medical condition and whether there is a conflict between the 5th Circuit and other U.S. Courts of Appeals |
| 20-5317 |
Jeremiah Rodgers v. Florida |
Florida |
2020-08-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure diagnostic-uncertainty due-process gender-dysphoria medical-evidence mental-health plea-bargaining plea-voluntariness post-conviction-relief procedural-bar |
Whether the newly discovered evidence of a criminal defendant's medical condition, including gender-dysphoria, may implicate the voluntariness of a pr… |
| 20-5117 |
Jeremiah M. Rodgers v. Florida |
Florida |
2020-07-21 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights criminal-defendant due-process equal-protection gender-dysphoria medical-condition voluntariness waiver-voluntariness waivers |
Whether the newly discovered evidence of a criminal defendant's medical condition, including gender dysphoria, may implicate the voluntariness of prio… |
| 19-1280 |
Idaho Department of Correction, et al. v. Adree Edmo, aka Mason Edmo |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-05-12 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
advocacy-organization-guidelines circuit-split constitutional-rights deliberate-indifference eighth-amendment estelle-v-gamble gender-dysphoria inmate-medical-care medical-care prison-healthcare |
Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in concluding that the guidelines set by an advocacy organization constitute the constitutional minima for inmate medi… |
| 18-676 |
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Ryan Karnoski, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-11-23 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Relisted (2) |
due-process equal-protection first-amendment gender-dysphoria military-service military-service-policy transgender transgender-individuals transgender-policy |
Whether the district court erred in preliminarily enjoining the military from implementing the Mattis policy nationwide |
| 18-677 |
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Jane Doe 2, et al. |
District of Columbia |
2018-11-23 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
constitutional-challenge due-process equal-protection gender-dysphoria military-policy military-service preliminary-injunction transgender transgender-military-service |
Whether the district court erred in preliminarily enjoining the military from implementing the Mattis policy nationwide |
| 18-678 |
Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Aiden Stockman, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-11-23 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process equal-protection gender-dysphoria military military-policy military-service preliminary-injunction standing transgender transgender-military-service transgender-policy |
Whether the district court erred in preliminarily enjoining the military from implementing the Mattis policy nationwide |