No. 18-6736

James E. Whitney v. Cindy Glover, Clerk, Circuit Court of Lincoln County, Arkansas, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-11-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection first-amendment free-speech religious-freedom standing
Latest Conference: 2019-01-18
Question Presented (from Petition)

Should and Individuals secured and protected Constitutional Right under the First Amendment to redress the Government for wrongs perpetuated against them be dependent upon ones ability to pay cost and fees to the Court?

Does the Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution transfer sovereignty from the living breathing sentient natural mortal to the World-of-Man Government Constructs; Thereby providing those who serve or are' employed in Constitutional or Legislative created positions or contract therewith, Immunity Protection from being held accountable for their conduct and/or decisions made in the performance of their Public Duties and responsibilities?

Should the Courts below be allowed to deny my secured and protected Constitutional Right to Due Process based upon my status of a Prisoner, held captive illegally without my consent and against my will, an "Enemy of the State" and Threat to National Security for my position on Sovereignty?

Should the form, formulation, or Construction of pleadings and motions by a Pro Se litigant, no matter how poorly articulated and inartfully styled, providing that they are technically sufficient and contain all the information required for a Tribunal or proper fact finder to be able to reasonably come to a proper rendering, prevalent a Pro Se litigant from exercising their most fundamental right to address and seek redress for wrongs committed against them by any other individual, entity, or World-of-Man Government construct?

Are not all individuals employed and serving in a Supervisory roles of the World-of-Man Government constructs, as with any person serving in supervisory roles, be they Public or Private, to be held accountable, and if thereby becoming actionable upon them, for the conduct of those under their supervisory sphere?

Is it not the mission and function of the Courts of this Republic to hold those individuals in position of power and authority in the World-of-Man Governments constructs accountable for their actions, omissions, conduct, and decisions made, protecting the sovereign people from which they derive their commission; upholding and executing the restraints found expressed in the Constitution?

By what means and for what purpose does the World-of-Man Government construct of the American Republic exist?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in dismissing petitioner's civil rights claims against respondents for lack of standing and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted

Docket Entries

2019-01-22
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2019-01-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.
2018-11-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 19, 2018)

Attorneys

James E. Whitney
James Edward Whitney — Petitioner