Whether wrongly excluded evidence may be used to rebut the presumption of guilt for a criminal conviction under Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298, 113 S.Ct. 851, 324, 332 (1995)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED For 4+he purpose of U.sc.a 2253 (c), is 4 debatable that weongly excluded evidence. may be used to rebub the presumption of guilt for A crimininl CoNVIGON UAder Schulp -VDelo 513 u.s 289, 113 5.c4 B51, 324, 332 C1995) 2 EP sufFicient Lacks are presented to demonstaste Yoalb a pelbioveg will be able. to prove he didw} commit the came preseiited ab daal should a US.CA 2253 (c) Cearfenke of appentability issue on 4 MISCARRIAGE. OF yushce claim ? Wher counsel does wok ensure mandatory procedures are followed and alley his cliewt to go to Sainl without Ynose safe guards in place is She Yreshslding showing. of a conshsubional viclation meet Soa USCA 2253 cerbSicate of appedacdlity z