No. 18-6048

In Re Daniel A. Spottsville

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2018-09-20
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: antiterrorism-and-effective-death-penalty-act civil-procedure civil-rights due-process habeas-corpus jurisdiction standing takings
Latest Conference: 2019-01-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to review the lower courts' decisions regarding the application of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) to habeas corpus petitions

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ) Quslionts, 02 a Slalerouionn dors Alli Seotbill haus led Sai nals af fi, ee at of lo Seulewen od AK hol 1. 3224 7 eH nok Ub lame te oebag S sbles cl Old cours whe ‘ “pul . ; Gj Oreunclenees it canes wa nding QroceaunsS Save ( : 8) Qualgr ie, dors MMe st efor US. Aumy Souter Wrornrbanr) weld , he hAs. . Ws, “en bl hg hearin) ooflew Ma seek inet gocrde, mba wr As Caagyo~Xs SE Ie Suh Lenndann del oussamniag ob fui ) Qualion is , Wa DerO touts’ doersions (shaberk ot heels Pucewed vas, Maks 2900( So) bis AT ig Lia a EEPA(AZO\ BOL 024285 MUS -T QUESTIONS (ComTiNUES) -) Qushenr te , weve Ani orusorte bo Arbol ° dsl tanks : Ub. Sipnnnes Cou *STALE DECISIS” a cabes Covstli hin vicladioe Wesco.veok, Lond *'? by Usicloren Code tot Mil Lony jurlece Ciena Dueckion , 92 fury ok ls, onil Qeenrs ool OW 8) Quslion le, as of Satdion? ak ls of veel ba Lope Uae sotalol Milock ote Dros tinckr niglek Deo~oa) bas Med only me . 0 : U Ske, bana ow lbedack bo cmyons> 2 a Q.) Quaslim ts, 08 0: Sold on neki diddy, deel shader anl® \yrnsdiclaan® oh Culedy® malts sullen 1S) Qiashin & shot Wer uk a ULO, t ) WA > EEDA RIO BELZAZEEDOS —Tr Question S (Cavtinugs) drtecbire ronda , ond Poca Lton( sewed) Question is Lesias A” Condamnn ell ervikcanninge doers! Omsbilicbterg™ Qroleelin Jo WOM) yunishichen (Vow) pan custody Ke t Quaint ata) vtheks : sou A ep ot hee eeu? cally Selene © as re ¢ Alu k Lud Val BE Wo 52 —* a) ok has o Valik 28 WSO$ SAK 5 . AMG OS Oad dino ‘ » yruidicli merge? wet taleng 40 Pros based om AW UW)Agation— iV A OCA CE 2 Atha Yad allen, ooclowes of Camel daar ag 21) Mn K haa dood annetled coolly Weer ude of Mace sere used of Readily Pores ae a Lele Pay seroma EEPALA DICER CSO — It |

Docket Entries

2019-01-22
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2019-01-02
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.
2018-10-25
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2018-10-15
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2018-09-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-07-03
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Daniel A. Spottsville
Daniel A. Spottsville — Petitioner
Daniel A. Spottsville — Petitioner