Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ers tae eit , win Disa 2 tate erg 1 7S pro ( See tent won iN Orisa {Watanabe Pe DK WWWRES Sprac oS Cree ab WAS Sued Santa Sees, eg, OSC vel Gone HUAN } Doss An AR | AQ TO Be Cle Y A Ce TASUOST wee us dudgesh prrsidt Br I ah REVEL pan s\DeeS WR Ww heh ~ | Re % BA Wats KSAT UN RRS bs Qos Sse gh ng ON doesy WL? Suwa ge a AT eRe SARIS Sega Suet Bd AR, % i R — _ ho, TS BS pve crea PEE Cauke of Corgeibray Leorahety Brey 5 Mare Soecial Cs, y DW Tt hawoe. Ragvsr TO Madit?
Docket Entries
2019-01-22
Petition DENIED. The Chief Justice and Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-01-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.
2018-12-26
Waiver of right of respondent US to respond filed.
2018-10-18
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 26, 2018)
Attorneys
Alonzo Dean Shephard
Alonzo Dean Shephard — Petitioner
usa
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent