No. 18-5965
Rayburn Scott Harmon v. United States
IFP
Tags: bodily-injury castleman-standard civil-rights criminal-law due-process felony-force-clause misdemeanor-force-clause statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent united-states-v-castleman violent-act violent-felonies violent-felony violent-force violent-physical-force
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-01-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the mere causation of bodily injury necessarily includes the use of violent, physical force
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The question presented is the one this Court expressly declined to resolve in United States v. Castleman, 134 S. Ct. 1405, 1414 (2014): Whether the mere causation of bodily injury necessarily includes the use of violent, physical force. i
Docket Entries
2019-01-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.
2018-12-14
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2018-11-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 14, 2018.
2018-11-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 14, 2018 to December 14, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-10-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 14, 2018.
2018-10-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2018 to November 14, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.
2018-09-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2018)
Attorneys
Rayburn Harmon
Jennifer Lynn Beck — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Jennifer Lynn Beck — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent