Are these conditions unconstitutionally vague?

QUESTION PRESENTED The United States Sentencing Guidelines recommend that the following be treated as “standard” conditions of supervised release, to be presumptively imposed in every judgment that includes a term of supervised release: If the defendant is arrested or questioned by a law enforcement officer, the defendant shall notify the probation officer within 72 hours. The defendant shall not own, possess, or have access to a firearm, ammunition, destructive device, or dangerous weapon (i.e., anything that was designed, or was modified for, the specific purpose of causing bodily injury or death to another person, such as nunchakus or tasers). U.S.8.G. § 5D1.3(c)(9), (10) (2018). Are these conditions unconstitutionally vague?