| 25A1147 |
United States v. Glenn Arthur Smith, Jr. |
District of Columbia |
2026-04-17 |
Application |
|
appellate-review batson-challenge jury-selection peremptory-strikes pretext-analysis racial-discrimination |
Question not identified. |
| 24-623 |
Lanlan Li v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC |
Seventh Circuit |
2024-12-06 |
Denied |
|
americans-with-disabilities-act employment-discrimination essential-job-function interactive-process pretext-analysis summary-judgment |
1. Whether an "essential job function," is a question of fact for the jury.
2. Whether the Seventh Circuit, along with many other circuits, is allowi… |
| 23-417 |
Ron Rutledge v. Board of County Commissioners of Johnson County, Kansas |
Tenth Circuit |
2023-10-19 |
Denied |
|
circuit-split civil-procedure employment-discrimination evidence honest-belief-defense mcdonnell-douglas mcdonnell-douglas-test pretext-analysis summary-judgment |
1. Does the honest belief defense violate the axiomatic law of summary judgment requiring the evidence and inferences to be viewed in favor of the non… |
| 22-713 |
Shannon Gladden v. The Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLC |
Eleventh Circuit |
2023-01-31 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
bostock bostock-interpretation but-for but-for-causation circuit-split civil-rights employment-discrimination evidence-evaluation motivating-factor pretext pretext-analysis |
1) Does the but-for reasoning referenced in Bostock apply to McDonnell Douglas pretext analysis?: In the decision below, the Eleventh Circuit appears … |
| 20-1622 |
Ramonica M. Luke v. University Health Services, Inc. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-05-20 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1981 admissible-evidence civil-rights civil-rights-act comparator-evidence employment-discrimination honest-belief-rule mcdonnell-douglas mcdonnell-douglas-framework pretext-analysis similarly-situated title-vii |
1. Applicable to the Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964 or 42 U.S.C, 1981, did Plaintiff prove pretext by discrimination by showing "weakness, impl… |
| 20-792 |
Melinda Beazley Pearson v. City of Augusta, Georgia, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-12-11 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination investigation loudermill-hearing neutral-decisionmaker pretext pretext-analysis public-employment summary-judgment |
Was it error for the panel to affirm a grant of summary judgment, finding due process had been provided where a challenged demotion had been effected … |
| 18-634 |
Aed El-Saba v. University of South Alabama |
Eleventh Circuit |
2018-11-15 |
Denied |
|
appellate-review civil-procedure employment-discrimination national-origin-discrimination pretext pretext-analysis retaliation summary-judgment supervisory-power termination |
Under Rule 10(a) when the trial court changes the language of the stated discharge reason; substitutes another document as the focus of pretext analys… |