No. 24-623
Lanlan Li v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC
Tags: americans-with-disabilities-act employment-discrimination essential-job-function interactive-process pretext-analysis summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2025-03-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an 'essential job function' is a question of fact for the jury and whether courts improperly grant summary judgment in ADA cases
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether an “essential job function,” is a question of fact for the jury. 2. Whether the Seventh Circuit, along with many other circuits, is allowing courts to grant summary judgment by improperly discounting legitimate questions of fact by: 1) misconstruing the pretext analysis; 2) overly crediting employer testimony; and 3) as to the context of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), overlooking failures to engage in the interactive process required under the ADA. i
Docket Entries
2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-02-05
Brief of Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC in opposition submitted.
2025-02-05
Brief of respondent Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC in opposition filed.
2024-12-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 5, 2025.
2024-12-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 6, 2025 to February 5, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-12-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 6, 2025)
Attorneys
Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC
Stephanie Ann Cantrell — Schueler, Dallavo & Casieri, Respondent
Stephanie Ann Cantrell — Schueler, Dallavo & Casieri, Respondent
Stephanie A. Cantrell — Schueler, Dallavo & Casieri, Respondent