No. 24-623

Lanlan Li v. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-12-06
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: americans-with-disabilities-act employment-discrimination essential-job-function interactive-process pretext-analysis summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2025-03-07
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether an 'essential job function' is a question of fact for the jury and whether courts improperly grant summary judgment in ADA cases

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether an “essential job function,” is a question of fact for the jury. 2. Whether the Seventh Circuit, along with many other circuits, is allowing courts to grant summary judgment by improperly discounting legitimate questions of fact by: 1) misconstruing the pretext analysis; 2) overly crediting employer testimony; and 3) as to the context of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), overlooking failures to engage in the interactive process required under the ADA. i

Docket Entries

2025-03-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-02-05
Brief of Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC in opposition submitted.
2025-02-05
2024-12-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 5, 2025.
2024-12-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 6, 2025 to February 5, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-12-03

Attorneys

Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC
Stephanie Ann CantrellSchueler, Dallavo & Casieri, Respondent
Stephanie Ann CantrellSchueler, Dallavo & Casieri, Respondent
Stephanie A. CantrellSchueler, Dallavo & Casieri, Respondent
Lanlan Li
Gwen-Marie DavisGDH Law Firm, Petitioner
Gwen-Marie DavisGDH Law Firm, Petitioner