Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals applied the wrong standard of review in analyzing the claims of deficient performance and prejudice by trial counsel

No question identified. : 1) pip THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLY THE WRONG ~ STANDARD OF REVIEW IN ANALYZING THE CLAIM OF DEFICIENT UPERFORMANCE BY? TRIAL COUNSEL? : 2) DID THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLY THE WRONG 7 STANDARD OF REVIEW IN ANALYZING THE CLAIM OF PREJUDICE FROM COUNSEL "S DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE BY REQUIRING A SHOWING THAT ABSENT COUNSEL'S ERRORS THE TRIAL WOULD : HAVE RESULTED IN AN ACQUITTAL? 3) DID. THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS MISINTERPRET THE , cir SBPREME COURT'S HOLDINGS IN HARRINGTON V. RICHTER 131 S.CT. 770(2011) AND HINTON V. ALABAMA 134 S.CT. 1081(2014) TO : "MODIFY THE PREJUDICE INQUIRY OF : STRCKLAND V. WASHINTON 4&66 U.S. 668(1984) LIMITING THE "DIFFERENT RESULT" PART OF THE INQUIRY TO AN ACQUITTAL IF THE DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE APPLIES TO THE GUILT PHASE GF THE DAO TRIAL? ~4&) DID THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLY THE WRONG : STANDARD OF REVIEW TO THE CLAIM OF PREJUDICE FROM COUNSEL'S DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE ‘IN FATLING TO ASSESS THE CUMULATIVE | 220 EFFECT OF COUNSEL'S ERRORS? i | . « .