Whether the district court deprived Flowers due process

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW (1) Whether the district court deprived Flowers due process by denying his § 2255 petition challenging his sentences under Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), without notice or an opportunity to be heard. (2) Whether reasonable jurists could debate whether Flowers is entitled to relief under Johnson from his Armed Career Criminal Act sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii), his 3 strikes sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c), and his career offender sentence under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 4B1.2(a)(2) (2000).