Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit erred in dismissing petitioner's motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) as an unauthorized successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED eee es & EPTSION, NL oman ‘ . ver, Untikel SEA Couey © appe A\S ON : Be ae i pacar NES iy, BS AOL ao =the, ‘United PRS MiStiey Mar the, Zastttn Dstia’ AY Nicgaud Consresiad, Mu Fed. R. GAP 60 Co) INSHON as 4 Un hsnociZea SICCEABNE 26 U6. A BOS Matian 4nd AisMissing WV Tae ac Jorsdicrional. x a intéa 2 Te \ he a Circa or ONE roman PEON Sar FoNEAT ng And VEnear ig En ANC, Bi OE WEN A) OES, Wl M Nor te, er a Dol Unser Ota, TR. Repo. 2. 3s iS ‘a \eaal ra teay +o 4 pre JE_ Morand i a) AS Cirtauit Coure OV \Ss Eo Cone Ae ppedls Kae Furth Recon AENIEA M\y. DEON Fae Te EA iN | algal ne pane eW bit Hs Coa’ A BOER te Su Areisiona | AY WS Cour’ Velen 4.