Junaidu Saljan Savage, aka James Kamara v. United States
DueProcess
Whether, under Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987), defendants requesting in camera review for potential required disclosures in accordance with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) of specific evidence possessed by the prosecution must demonstrate beyond a plausible showing that the evidence in question, which they have no ability to review, would, in fact, contain material and favorable evidence
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether, under Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987), defendants requesting in camera review for potential required disclosures in accordance with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) of specific evidence possessed by the prosecution must demonstrate beyond a plausible showing that the evidence in question, which they have no ability to review, would, in fact, contain material and favorable evidence. i