| 24-1240 |
Unkechaug Indian Nation, et al. v. Amanda Lefton, Commissioner, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2025-06-05 |
Denied |
|
daubert-standard due-process expert-testimony gatekeeping-obligation in-camera-review summary-judgment |
Whether the District Court violated Petitioners' due process rights by granting summary judgment without first fulfilling its gatekeeping obligation u… |
| 23-7186 |
Anthony Roland v. Department of Justice |
Seventh Circuit |
2024-04-09 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure due-process federal-rules-of-civil-procedure fourteenth-amendment in-camera-review judicial-system legal-proceeding meet-and-confer preliminary-injunction summary-judgment |
Whether permitted by Due process shall a ruling and proceeding take place without a "Meet and Confer"? Eventually causing abstract or ambiguous adjudi… |
| 22-636 |
S. S. v. United States, et al. |
Armed Forces |
2023-01-09 |
Denied |
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) |
court-martial criminal-appeal evidentiary-review in-camera-review intervention-rights jaffee-v-redmond m.r.e.-513 military-evidence military-rule-of-evidence psychotherapist-patient-privilege psychotherapist-privilege upjohn-co-v-united-states |
1. Whether diagnoses and treatments are
privileged under the military's
psychotherapist-patient privilege; and
2. Whether a privilege holder has the … |
| 21-1017 |
Carolyn Jewel, et al. v. National Security Agency, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-01-19 |
Denied |
Amici (3) |
civil-rights classified-evidence electronic-surveillance in-camera-review mass-surveillance national-security nonjusticiable standing standing-doctrine state-secrets-privilege |
This lawsuit challenges publicly-acknowledged
government mass-surveillance programs that over the
past 20 years have (1) intercepted, copied, and
sear… |
| 21-6412 |
Rebecca Stampe v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-11-24 |
GVR |
IFP |
brady-disclosure criminal-procedure due-process evidence-review government-disclosure in-camera-review materiality materiality-standard prosecutorial-discretion |
Can the district court, consistent with Brady and its progeny, refuse in camera review of evidence that is plausibly subject to disclosure under Brady… |
| 20-828 |
Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al. v. Yassir Fazaga, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-12-18 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (11)Relisted (2) |
civil-procedure ex-parte-proceedings fisa foreign-intelligence foreign-intelligence-surveillance-act government-surveillance in-camera-review national-security state-secrets-privilege |
Whether Section 1806(f) displaces the state-secrets privilege and authorizes a district court to resolve, in camera and ex parte, the merits of a laws… |
| 19-8779 |
Nader Salem Elhuzayel v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2020-06-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
due-process electronic-surveillance ex-parte-proceedings ex-parte-review fifth-amendment fisa in-camera-review sixth-amendment |
Whether the district court's in camera, ex parte review of the materials, application, and surveillance order without permitting disclosure or partici… |
| 19-6905 |
John Alan Conroy v. Cliff Harris, Sheriff, Pecos County, Texas, et al. |
Texas |
2019-12-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-court-consideration-of-evidence appointment-of-counsel brady-v-maryland brady-violation continuing-duty-of-federal-government criminal-procedure discovery discovery-rules dismissal-with-prejudice due-process evidence-withholding federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure in-camera-review michael-morton-act plea-agreement plea-bargaining rule-16-federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure state-law-enforcement state-law-enforcement-compliance |
(1) After a. criminal defendant's plea of guilty, if it is later
found that the government did not live up to the requirements
- of discovery, is the… |
| 18-7654 |
Steven Fausnaught v. United States |
Third Circuit |
2019-01-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights due-process in-camera-review judicial-integrity judicial-misconduct medical-records mental-capacity recusal separation-of-powers standing |
Whether the district court is required, in an effort to preserve the integrity of the judicial system generally, and Petitioner's Due Process Rights, … |
| 18-947 |
Michael S. Barth v. Township of Bernards, New Jersey, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2019-01-18 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appeal appeal-timeliness appeals civil-rights court-of-appeals court-rules due-process ex-parte ex-parte-motion in-camera-review judicial-misconduct misconduct procedural-rules |
Whether if a member of the Court of Appeals sends a party a "racist" mailing of a court initiated letter, whether intentional or unintentional, does a… |
| 18-6267 |
Denise Robertson v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-10 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court-conflict circuit-split criminal-procedure document-disclosure evidence-review in-camera-review jencks-act palermo-v-united-states reasonable-particularity threshold-showing united-states-v-palermo |
1. Whether, when the defendant and government disagree as to whether a specifically identified document constitutes a "statement" under the Jencks Act… |
| 18-439 |
Peter Janangelo v. Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-05 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-procedure federal-agency federal-agency-discretion foia-exemptions foia-request freedom-of-information-act glomar-response in-camera-review information-disclosure judicial-discretion national-security vaughn-index |
1. If Glomar Responses are permitted should they be limited to instances involving national security, public safety, or public health?
2. Under what … |
| 18-5225 |
Junaidu Saljan Savage, aka James Kamara v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-07-12 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
brady-disclosure brady-v-maryland constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts-of-appeal in-camera-review pennsylvania-v-ritchie precedent prosecutorial-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct ritchie standing |
Whether, under Pennsylvania U. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987), defendants requesting in camera review for potential required disclosures in accordance wi… |