ex-parte-review

5 cases — ← All topics

Case Title Lower Court Docketed Status Flags Tags Question Presented
25-5672 Basaaly Saeed Moalin v. United States Ninth Circuit 2025-09-18 Denied Response WaivedIFP business-records constitutional-challenge ex-parte-review fourth-amendment metadata-collection surveillance-act (1) Whether a United States Court of Appeals may avoid ruling on a constitutional challenge to a statute implicating Fourth Amendment concerns if it d…
22-190 Wikimedia Foundation v. National Security Agency/Central Security Service, et al. Fourth Circuit 2022-08-30 Denied Amici (3) civil-rights dismissal due-process evidence-review ex-parte-review general-dynamics judicial-dismissal legal-procedure national-security reynolds state-secrets state-secrets-privilege Does the state secrets privilege authorize courts to dismiss actions where plaintiffs can prove their case without privileged evidence?
19-8779 Nader Salem Elhuzayel v. United States Ninth Circuit 2020-06-22 Denied Response WaivedIFP due-process electronic-surveillance ex-parte-proceedings ex-parte-review fifth-amendment fisa in-camera-review sixth-amendment Whether the district court's in camera, ex parte review of the materials, application, and surveillance order without permitting disclosure or partici…
19-1378 Phazzer Electronics, Inc. v. Taser International, Inc. Federal Circuit 2020-06-16 Denied Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) ex-parte-review federal-circuit patent-cancellation patent-claims patent-damages remand standing uspto-cancellation uspto-reexamination Is the Federal Circuit's affirmation of patent damages correct in light of the USPTO's cancellation of the patent claims?
18-8197 Tommy Earl Boone, Jr. v. Texas Texas 2019-02-28 Dismissed IFP civil-rights constitutional-interpretation criminal-code criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection ex-parte-review habeas-corpus incarceration incarceration-period parole sentencing sentencing-statute texas-criminal-procedure texas-law Whether Texas Penal Code, Art. 42.082 is unconstitutional as interpreted by the Texas Court in Ex Parte Kuester, 24 SW3d 247 (2000)?