No. 19-1378
Phazzer Electronics, Inc. v. Taser International, Inc.
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: ex-parte-review federal-circuit patent-cancellation patent-claims patent-damages remand standing uspto-cancellation uspto-reexamination
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is the Federal Circuit affirmation of the patent damages now incorrect in light of the change of circumstances created by cancellation of all patent claims by the USPTO?
2) Is remand to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit timely and appropriate in light of the change of circumstances created by the USPTO cancellation of all patent claims?
3) Does Respondent lack standing to assert said patent claims since the USPTO cancellation of all patent claims?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the Federal Circuit's affirmation of patent damages correct in light of the USPTO's cancellation of the patent claims?
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-08
Supplemental brief of petitioner Phazzer Electroinics, Inc. filed.
2020-10-05
Supplemental brief of respondent Taser International, Inc., filed. (Distributed)
2020-09-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-18
Reply of petitioner Phazzer Electroinics, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2020-09-04
Brief of respondent Taser International, Inc., in opposition filed.
2020-08-05
Response Requested. (Due September 4, 2020)
2020-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-17
Waiver of right of respondent Taser International, Inc. to respond filed.
2020-06-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 16, 2020)
Attorneys
Phazzer Electroinics, Inc.
Joseph Asher Davidow — Willis & Davidow, LLC, Petitioner
Taser International, Inc.,
Pamela B. Petersen — Axon Enterprise, Inc., Respondent