Whether permitted by Due Process shall a ruling and proceeding take place without a 'Meet and Confer'?

QUESTION PRESENTED ye ee CEAYFSI . Why should the law refuse its protection on law-abiding. , Citizens? From the perspective of an African American Pro Se unfortunately, I ask myself this question while architecting my lawsuit. I found out that Judges are too often unwilling to listen : to facts and reasons, but rather discreetly showing favoritism or special liking on one side but of course, denying it with : decorative law terminologies. When Judge ignores facts and . reasoning they destroy the regulations of the judicial system which in tum destroys faith in the judicial system. Perhaps it would benefit the judicial system and restore faith in everyday Citizens if they use the swom oath concept of Lady Justice : ignoring predilections and focusing on facts. . ' This petition presents the following question closely . interwoven within the Fourteenth Amendment, that . metamorphosis towards Due Process of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. : The Question Presented is: Whether permitted by Due process shall a ruling and ; proceeding take place without a “Meet and Confer’? : Eventually causing abstract or ambiguous adjudication.