No. 18-7654
Steven Fausnaught v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights due-process in-camera-review judicial-integrity judicial-misconduct medical-records mental-capacity recusal separation-of-powers standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-02-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court is required to undertake an In Camera review of District Court Judge Edwin Kosik's medical records to determine the onset of dementia and remove the appearance of impropriety
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the district court is required, in an effort to preserve the integrity of the judicial system generally, and Petitioner's Due Process Rights, specifically, to undertake an In Camera review of District Court Judge Edwin Kosik's medical records so as to determine when the onset of dementia began and to remove the clear appearance of impropriety that exists where a District Court Judge presided over his court with a diminished mental capacity? i :
Docket Entries
2019-02-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-02-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-01-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent