Whether if a member of the Court of Appeals sends a party a 'racist' mailing of a court initiated letter, whether intentional or unintentional, does a related ex parte in camera motion to extend the time to file an appeal because of the court's racist mailing, allow the court of appeals to file an appeal as within the time allowed by court rule, or do the court rules require a stay of that decision until the completion of a review of a separate misconduct complaint?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether if a member of the Court of Appeals : ‘sends a party a “racist” mailing of a court initiated ; : : letter, whether intentional or unintentional, does a related ex parte in camera motion to extend the time to , ‘file an appeal because of the court’s racist mailing, : . : allow the court of appeals to file an appeal as within oan ' the time allowed by court rule, or do the court rules require a stay of that decision until the completion of a review of a separate misconduct complaint? . 2. If a Court of Appeals does not act on an ex parte in camera motion, can a party appeal without an . ; order to appeal? ; ,