Does federal court deference to an ex parte judicial order violate due process?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : le Does Fecleral Courd dLerence to an ex parte JSodiere! Order, adsplec| from dhe Respondents Consolicedecl Mohan Sor Gummar Audgmers y esol wn clame hed were nol clecicled on Vhe merits Vas viokahon { AE pPpa ancl or Mhe Duc Process Clause © 2. Jn Jk | 201 the Wyomin Legislalure enactecl Nowe Bill CO23, which, amendecl several Slade hes do come indo Compliance with Umbecd States Supreme Court clceistons pertean “sy do vacons} qutonal sentences Yor pvenite offenders. ths AeA encompassed Shak Salute WS $ & Pp-do HW of Wyomings Nobatuot Caminel AeA. Was if delerminecl by, the Sledes Legs lature when v4 mace amoral yucky nd to amend the Karel Caminal Act that hey dclemunect Vas ctucland unusual ane therelse unconstidutional . fo even Cotatder a Celany commited as ajovenile when deeich ng Je give semeone a marlalory" We sentence under thai Act © on. “Does a substantive. role change of a. slate cludube opphy redtroachyc y to qualific d pe Sons usho § Conduct Tals unthia the Amendecl chad uly Veawa® Y. Were the issues ob Rosccvlonal Misconduct presentedt nv he United Shades Distred Cour\) Heyy sues presentec| S. She hrs) time m Sedleral Gaur} or were these tssucs properly carsecl in Mhe Gade Distrrcd Court ? 5. Mr. Counts presented 33 issues of Roseevlorial Misconcluct in his Slate Rs} -Gavietion Rolie Ration, more then IB of Shese issucs were . have consiclercel these vndisputed Issues) OF granted the Wired baced On A nen: chal enge ? b. Shasld the Oordeck edes District Couct and the Ten Greod Coord re) f Appeals uscd the shancese| A review for claims nol Acaaced on the ments when reviewing the claims raised From Mi. Counts Shake Pos. Gaviction Relic! Pelton 7, “The \Wyomin a) Supreme Cours clecidect Yred | Woes error do der M. Counts the right to Cross examine ancl impeach the witness agans\ hum, but wos tt harmless beyoncl a reasorue doll 4o deny Mr. Counts entire defense to shows modenal lavas of the viclims css ‘ mony Md changed! attr she Wes eraployed Lyte Shoe a> GQ conhidert el informant ) wohen his cnlice delense reston a Showing oh Vetus? . &. Should Me. Counts awe leecin aren Counse\ uncer Markinveév Ryan do properly develope his nefleclive Assistance of Gyonsel CAC) issues © a. Should Mc. Counts howe receiver a folk and Pave hearin on his us Aracaclmers! (sSueS direct Ny Creating (Je Amendmen} \SSue$ oy ree? 1 Did the Oniled Shales Supreme Coord abuse us diserction by nol appovelin Counse} do Mr Counts onder he Criminal dostice Act € abet 1% USC Pacovhe Hs Dil dhe Tedth Crreod Court of Appeals close is discretion by nul even Ye Spon dina do Mr Counts Melton fsx Kepaintment of Goonsel Chel on , Fehewuer a jon? : 1d. dos My. Counts right Jo Access f Courts boon domecl by ein shipped fron Wyoming do Virgie wn dhe widkdleat his achive cnacTappea ) vohere hats Unable to access She apprepred books and locale Cases ciel by the Respanilent cand Couek in the Vieginier Prison Lewes Librony ? 4 & .