No. 18-5292
Armando Angeles v. United States
Tags: circuit-court-interpretation circuit-split criminal-procedure fourth-amendment lane-maintenance search-and-seizure state-court-interpretation state-federal-court-tension statutory-interpretation suppression-motion traffic-laws traffic-statute traffic-stop
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in applying the Kansas Supreme Court's interpretation of a Kansas traffic statute governing the failure to maintain a lane
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, when affirming the denial of Mr. Angeles’ motion to suppress, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in applying the Kansas Supreme Court’s interpretation of a Kansas traffic statute governing the failure to maintain a lane, an error that also implicates divergent views of similar statutes nationwide? i
Docket Entries
2018-10-01
Petition DENIED.
2018-08-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 24, 2018)
2018-05-16
Application (17A1271) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until July 16, 2018.
2018-05-01
Application (17A1271) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 17, 2018 to July 16, 2018, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Armando Angeles
John Carl Arceci — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
John Carl Arceci — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent