No. 18-5357

Michael C. Redifer v. United States

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-07-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: congressional-legislation criminal-procedure due-process kastigar-doctrine law-of-the-case rules-enabling-act supreme-court-precedent supreme-court-precedents
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2018-09-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Rules Enabling Act preclude a court from invoking the law of the case doctrine against a defendant in a criminal proceeding when the law of the case is egregiously in violation of numerous items of Congressional legislation and/or Supreme Court precedents?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : Questions of Importance. : : ' Does the Rules Enabling Act, 28 USCS § 2071 et seq., preclude a Court fron invoking the law of the case doctrine against. a defendant in a criminal . proceeding, when the law of the case is egregiously in violation of numerous , items of Congressional Legislation and/or Supreme-Court precedents? Does the Rules Enabling Act, 28 USCS § 2071 et seq., preclude a Court from invoking the law of the case doctrine against a defendant in a criminal proceeding, when an issue being raised is a new issue that was not ruled on in the prior mandate? Should 18 USCS § 6002 be declared Unconstitutional and Kastigar v. United States, 406 US 441 (1972) overruled? )

Docket Entries

2018-10-01
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2018-08-29
Supplemental brief of petitioner Michael C. Redifer filed. (Distributed)
2018-08-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/24/2018.
2018-08-05
Supplemental brief of petitioner Michael C. Redifer filed. (Distributed)
2018-08-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-07-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 27, 2018)

Attorneys

Michael C. Redifer
Michael Caine Redifer — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent