| 23-1198 |
Harisadhan Patra, et ux. v. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2024-05-07 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure first-amendment frcp-56 independent-review local-rules material-facts religious-harassment statement-of-material-facts summary-judgment supreme-court-precedents workplace-discrimination |
Do the United States Court of Appeals have obligations to enforce FRCP 56 and the Supreme Court's precedents when Statement of Material Facts and supp… |
| 23-5539 |
Trezjuan Thompson v. United States |
First Circuit |
2023-09-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review circuit-court-of-appeals circuit-split criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing deficient-performance ineffective-assistance new-rule-doctrine new-rule-of-law sentencing-counsel supreme-court-precedents |
How far afield from prior criminal sentencing cases does a doctrinal opinion from a regional circuit court of appeals have to go before it qualifies a… |
| 22-6050 |
Jane Doe v. City of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-11-14 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
access-to-courts civil-rights constitutional-rights court-access due-process federal-procedure judicial-misconduct legal-filing procedural-due-process statutory-law supreme-court-precedents |
Whether the federal court of appeals should be allowed to criminally dismiss the strikingly meritorious appeal |
| 22-5271 |
Jose Erbo, aka Tito, aka Pinguita, aka Miguel Garcia v. United States |
Second Circuit |
2022-08-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
6th-amendment autopsy-reports confrontation-clause due-process legal-conflict supreme-court-precedent supreme-court-precedents testimonial testimonial-evidence |
Whether Autopsy Reports Are Testimonial For Purposes Of The Confrontation Clause, And Whether The Unreasonable Application Of Clearly Established Supr… |
| 21-71 |
Washington County, Utah v. Martin Crowson |
Tenth Circuit |
2021-07-20 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
deliberate-indifference eighth-amendment inmate-medical-care municipal-liability section-1983 supreme-court-precedents |
Whether a municipal government can be liable under the Eighth Amendment for denial of inmate medical care under § 1983 |
| 19-8671 |
Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-06-11 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
chief-justice-roberts conflict-of-interest constitutional-redress government-issued-patents judicial-misconduct knights-of-malta patent-rights supreme-court-precedent supreme-court-precedents |
Whether Chief Justice Roberts' conflict of interest as a member of the Knights of Malta prejudices inventors' patent rights |
| 18-7767 |
Joshua Sanchez v. Texas |
Texas |
2019-02-05 |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-interpretation court-of-appeals due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment mandatory-minimum mandatory-minimum-sentence supreme-court-precedent supreme-court-precedents texas-court-of-appeals |
Whether the interpretation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments by the Texas Court of Appeals is in conflict with preceden… |
| 18-5357 |
Michael C. Redifer v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2018-07-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
congressional-legislation criminal-procedure due-process kastigar-doctrine law-of-the-case rules-enabling-act supreme-court-precedent supreme-court-precedents |
Does the Rules Enabling Act preclude a court from invoking the law of the case doctrine against a defendant in a criminal proceeding when the law of t… |