No. 22-5271
Jose Erbo, aka Tito, aka Pinguita, aka Miguel Garcia v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment autopsy-reports confrontation-clause due-process legal-conflict supreme-court-precedent supreme-court-precedents testimonial testimonial-evidence
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Autopsy Reports Are Testimonial For Purposes Of The Confrontation Clause, And Whether The Unreasonable Application Of Clearly Established Supreme Court's Precedents In This Case Warrants For The Judgment In Feliz To Be Reversed
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Autopsy Reports Are Testimonial For Purposes Of The Confrontation Clause, And Whether The Unreasonable Application Of Clearly Established Supreme Court's Precedents In This Case Warrants For The Judgment In Feliz To Be Reversed
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-08-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 2, 2022)
Attorneys
Jose Erbo
Jose Erbo — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent