Whether the federal court of appeals should be allowed to criminally dismiss the strikingly meritorious appeal

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the federal court of appeals should be allowed: ¢ to criminally “dismiss” the strikingly meritorious appeal that presents such questions as violations of the statutory law, the US Supreme Court’s precedents, the Federal Rules, the Constitution, the code of conduct for federal judges, etc. as “frivolous;” ¢ to criminally barricade access to “courts” to Petitioner and deprive her of all legal and constitutional rights through crime, deceit, and perversions of the procedure, law, rules, and facts; e to deceive the public, including regarding the contents of the Petitioner’s filings; e to pervert and disregard the law, procedure, and all the facts — in order to assist with the crimes against Petitioner and the cover-ups while operating under the color of law. This is the SECOND petition for certiorari that pertains to the same legal action and the same multiyear, multidistrict criminal abuse and denial of meaningful access to courts through record falsification, perversion of the law — including gross violations of the statutory law, perversion of the fact, entirely ignoring the Petitioner’s filings, unlawfully suppressing the Petitioner’s legal , action and not taking any action on it for months or years, not accepting initiating documents for filing, not accepting — four times to date — the filing fee, stealing all Petitioner’s funds (through racketeering activity and by criminally depriving Petitioner of costs to which Petitioner is entitled as a matter of law and by criminally throwing the Petitioner’s actions out and forcing her to pay filing fee over and over again), lying about the contents of the Petitioner’s filings, criminally ignoring for months the Petitioner’s emergency motions and motions for restraining order and intentionally causing Petitioner to suffer irreparable harm, etc. The FIRST petition for certiorari that pertains to this legal action has been assigned No, 22-5392 and dated August 18, 2022. 2