Whether inadmissible asylum-seekers who are victims of qualifying criminal activity involving U.S. citizens can be lawfully detained or denied entry under 8 U.S.C. §1225(b), 8 U.S.C. §1158, and the Equal Protection Doctrine

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Under 8 U.S.C. §1225(b), inadmissible aliens who arrive at U.S. National borders must be detained, and the alien must be given a bond hearing every six months. Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. (2018). In accordance with 8 U.S.C. §1158, Petitioner who is an immigrant victim of Qualifying Criminal Activity involving U.S. citizens has applied for Asylum before, But Petitioner was not allowed to board a flight to the United States. Because CBP does not approve of his ESTA visa under VWP without reasonable reason. Therefore, the person cannot arrive at U.S. National Borders seeking as a destitute asylum seekers. Trump v. Hawaii, No. 17-965, 585 U.S. (2018) The questions presented are: 1. Whether under 8 U.S.C. §1225(b)(1)(B)Gi), inadmissible aliens who are Asylum Seekers include immigrant victim who is not an applicant for, or is not granted, immigrant status under 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(15)(U) of Qualifying Criminal Activity involving U.S. citizens, his prolonged or temporarily detention, or confinement and was not allowed to board a flight to the United States because the President of the United States ordered DHS under the circumstances are unlawful, or unconstitutional? 2. Whether ‘A substantial risk that physical force against the person or property of another may be used in the course of committing the offense’, 18 U.S.C. §16(b) includes “{invisible] potential or underlying Special Malicious Homosexual Rapist Master Murderers’ Criminal Activities”?