Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
SocialSecurity HabeasCorpus
Whether the U.S. Federal District Court of Minnesota is the appropriate venue and jurisdiction to present an appeal for a tort suit against the Social Security Administration (SSA) when submitted on Standard Form 95
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Is the U.S. Federal District Court of Minnesota the appropriate venue and jurisdiction to present an Appeal for a suit Sounding in Tort against the Social Security Administration (SSA) when correctly submitted on Standard Form 95, Prescribed by the Department of Justice (Form No. NSN 7540-00-634-4046). 2) Do the words “arising under” as applied to benefit claims under U.S. Code, Title 42, Chapter 7, Subchapter II § 405(h) by previous courts also apply to the _ law when said claim is presented as a separate suit for tortfeasance. 3) Does the precedence of common law (stare decisis) set for Corporate Appellants regarding timeliness also apply to Pro-Se Appellants.