| 21-5298 |
In Re Rayfield Thibeaux |
|
2021-08-04 |
Denied |
IFP |
access-to-court civil-procedure civil-rights due-process forensic-services medical-records mental-health mental-health-treatment social-security social-security-administration standing |
Question Presented For Review |
| 20-8092 |
Darryl L. Williams v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, et al. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-05-20 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
constitutional-rights contract-rescission contracts-minors government-petition minor-rights null-and-void right-to-alter-government right-to-petition-government right-to-property right-to-pursue-happiness self-determination social-security-administration |
Right to rescind contract signed as a minor |
| 18-8710 |
Veronica Moody Johnson v. Social Security Administration |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-04-05 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
14th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights declaratory-judgment due-process lien lien-enforcement social-security social-security-administration spousal-support |
Whether the United States District Court had jurisdiction to make a 14th Amendment due process declaration of rights |
| 18-8035 |
Loretta C. Adigun v. Express Scripts, Inc. |
Eleventh Circuit |
2019-02-20 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
ada ada-reasonable-accommodation,eeoc-right-to-sue,dis americans-with-disabilities-act eeoc eeoc-charge employment-discrimination prima-facie-case reasonable-accommodation right-to-sue social-security-administration |
Did Loretta C. Adigun neglect to satisfy the third prong of the prima facie case |
| 18-6791 |
Benjamin Bland v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-11-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination evidence evidence-admissibility government-evidence harmless-error hearsay sixth-amendment social-security-administration trial-procedure |
Whether petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses was violated |
| 18-5448 |
Ellen Elizabeth Packenham Stanley v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
Eighth Circuit |
2018-08-06 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
42-usc-405(h) administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jurisdiction pro-se pro-se-appellant social-security-administration standing stare-decisis tort tort-claim venue venue-jurisdiction |
Whether the U.S. Federal District Court of Minnesota is the appropriate venue and jurisdiction to present an appeal for a tort suit against the Social… |