Whether the United States District Court had jurisdiction to make a 14th Amendment due process declaration of rights

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the United States District Court had jurisdiction to make a 14" /5" Amendment due process declaration of rights pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Complaint filed by Petitioner, pro se, when the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION had refused to execute a LIEN duly served upon the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION by the local Sheriff's Department directing the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION to liquidate the current monthly SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Payment Benefit Entitlement of Petitioner’s ex-spouse to satisfy a spousal support judgment? 2. Whether the refusal of the United States District Court Judge to compel the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION to produce the Certified Administrative Record of a spousal support judgment debtor as “relevant evidence,” to allow Petitioner to prove the existence and value of a spousal support : judgment debtor’s readily liquidatable current monthly SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Payment Benefit Entitlement “asset” as authorized by 42 USC 659 (a) and (b) upon Petitioner’s Motion for Production, Motion to Compel, and the law of Local Rule 7 (c) violated Petitioners 14" Amendment right to due process and Fundamental Fairness in a Court proceeding? 3. Whether the United States District Court’s misrepresentation of Petitioner’s Declaratory Judgment issue in her FINAL ORDER, as enforcement a “moot” spousal support “Garnishment Order” as opposed to a Declaratory Judgment Complaint to declare Petitioner’s 14" Amendment due process rights, was in violation of 14" Amendment substantive due process?