Did Loretta C. Adigun neglect to satisfy the third prong of the prima facie case

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED L_ Did Loretta C. Adigun neglect to satisfy the third prong of the prima facie case; by a lack of evidence, showing she requested a reasonable accommodation from Express Scripts, Inc.? I. Should the Right-To-Sue letter issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) granting Loretta C. Adigun (charging party) permission to sue Express Scripts, Inc. (respondent) under The Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C § 12101 (“ADA”), be on trial in the district court for wrong entity? If so, should this trial run simultaneously with the case for which it grants the right-to-sue? Ill. Should discovery be gathered on Loretta C. Adigun for activities done after discharge from employment? If so, what would be the relevance of such discovery? Should question(s) answered on the Social Security Administration intake questionnaire by Adigun, after discharge from employment be relevant to whether she was unfairly discharged based on her disability? ‘ A ‘ hikévia Adi cun .