Did the staff of the 'Project Freedom Fund' who provided faulty legal advice to petitioner, and thus induced her to withdraw a guilty plea for which she would have been sentenced to only fifteen (15) years, render legal representation despite not having been admitted to practice law in New Jersey, thus violate petitioner's right to effective assistance of counsel?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; QUESTION ONE: : a ; ; 1. DID THE STAFF OF THE “PROJECT FREEDOM FUND” WHO PROVIDED ; c ' FAULTY LEGAL ADVICE TO PETITIONER, AND THUS INDUCED HER TO : : WITHDRAW A GUILTY PLEA FOR WHICH SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN SENTENCED TO ONLY FIFTEEN (15) YEARS, RENDER LEGAL REPRESENTATION DESPITE NOT HAVING BEEN ADMITTED TO PRACTICE . : LAW IN NEW JERSEY, THUS VIOLATE PETITIONER’S RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL? (U.S. Const. Amendment Six) . 2. DID THE ABOVE CRCUMSTANCES CONSTITUTE INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL (U.S. Const. Amend. Six) ; a .