Whether 42 U.S.C. § 1983 provides statutory standing for a District State Judge, a US District Court Justice, and Three Justices of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals to assert a claim that they are 'above the Law'

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | 1. 42 U.S.C. § 1983, allows a person whose constitutional rights have been deprived to bring an action to redress the constitutional deprivation. 2. Article two of the U.S. Constitution establishes the executive branch of the Federal government which carries out and enforces Federal Laws. The . executive branch includes the President, the Vice-President, the Cabinet, executive departments, independent agencies and other boards, commissions and committees. Does 42, U.S.C. § 1983, provide statutory standing for a . District State Judge of NM, a US District Court Justice (DNM), and Three Justices of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, Co., to assert a claim that they are “above the Law”, by not conducting United States of America? Such as Title 18, U.S.C. § 1346 (honest services fraud); Title 18, U.S.C. § 1509 (Obstruction of Court Orders); Title 18, U.S.C. § 1621 (Perjury generally), and Title 18, U.S.C. § 4 (Misprision of a felony), when the NM State District Judge (Franchini), Denied Plaintiffs request for Relief from District ; Court Order (App A, 10a-11a), under Rule 60(B)(3) FRCP? (App A, 12a). Never cited, but instead, suppressed the evidence contained within the Transcript of Proceedings for the May 21, 2014, Summary Judgment Hearing with Judge Theodore Baca, (App A, 3a-9a). Is this Obstruction of Justice? : 4. In the US District Court for the District of NM, a final judgment was rendered by the USDC (DNM), dismissing plaintiffs complaints against the 2nd JDSC (App B, 13a-14) and LMC (App B, 15a-16a). y . 5. Judge Kelly further ordered, “and that Defendant Lovelace Medical Center may recover costs from the Plaintiff’. Why would this not be considered retaliation and extortion under Title 18, U.S.C. § 4? the FACTS are, that on May 21, 2014, District Judge Ted Baca, . GRANTED the Plaintiff one award of a claim of defamation made against the defendant. . / Do the Justices of the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, have standing, to assert a claim, that they have the authority to affirm a lower court’s decision that was in _ violation of Title 18, § 1509 (obstruction of court orders), and Title 18, USC. §4 (Misprision ofa felony)? ; 6. “In Skilling v. United States, 561 U.S. 358 (2010), was a United States . Supreme Court case interpreting the honest services fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § . 1346. . vil . :