Whether the lower court erred in dismissing the case due to an improper interpretation of the legal requirements for filing a claim, despite the petitioner's limited financial resources and lack of legal counsel

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED D Drefevence to the decisims mode by the lowe Crate, the Ploinkigg wughe Choase fo express himself especially ir The longuage of, temple to velore Fe The language of the Low. Fo vernain velevant , whot ove The legal Steps gfsv thes Kinrol oF Situodim , Shere 1 was eowlie, requived fo Rxaltly -expresr rregselys po meet Tha 2Kack Conditions, white | Am a respickee Pitmer ciithod any Comsel assisting in Hes Legel Peas? Fev instance, what is a’ Canin?” J) The Lower Comte Claimed that I foiled dosiete a Claim, he dichomacy Meaning OF tHe bsord “Claim " vio net be the exact d egeaiton of fhe Gore asrwd by fre bow Courts. dn Hu's Cate, bepove | usos allocated Case Numbers [8-Z0lF and Oc-NOSippeevO91 TZ SAC, | hetieve 2° Cose pumbe sold be attocetred wittat a deprite Cloim av reanm fv Girrg & [aged process Was this Sugftiet fo olismiss the Cos ov wor te a pwist Fe hoecwe vse s fo axeid Some thing provable 2 Must Uquote tha exact law captions ov Sections ? 3 Tho Most. 1 evifov tant iSfun Was thot, o$ this Coe goes on, $ osishedd that | om 1 gue meelical ervites becouse | doubt if fhe dlamage Fo human beoly con be v estore gn. Suck & wiwSening Scenwio. “Slot de | hove fo clo fe receive Melita atterto becouse | Connst fore the ent, provide te act om whot he vefused fe at upon? 4) fe sas almast Monolatiny fo accept flot fie +eetirn heal Pride wor achny under fle cslov of Stott. Thee wor me often fo Pracend Wit The Precast Othe than Sapng thet fie deferdat oar acting Consistent Ut, SPR reg uu ten ents « The gtote did not prescribe Such tcreme froin Of Part of my Punishment» Tha Shore did net agree ctx me Phot | ostit be [ecked UP wifteut ony odfertes fa a bakin blending interral body Part, or, He Inflomened thorax ard abdomen, uiifl nat hove medical attention 5 Flot USIaTiOL pgm Vemit blood and Prt, it Cott be solved here iA jaxt: Why must [ ow uses | Needed Consent fe ole few request fhot The ecttt Provider & aching «the Colov op (tore? 3) Revels the Conclusion oF the case dismisses! by us Eout of Appenle, ond 27% the ear lie lower Cowty ushot L205 easy te co? TM define Te meaning OF Fe esavel “lain” ov fo write Q let. of cismitcap , 22h letter ott. atleast repeated presses of “WE Assume Guat. 2" 8 Guan thot my firiancisl Situation ip in Such Collopted situation, ie le possible fer fix Cowt wb asrign a loner ov ative, fo act as my other representative T fis per Mey Sitvotin, | Prom that foo Seon | May be Mh a host. disaster, prbabl, altsobleds is fe posible that J can be Served by kyo vapretenhag Courses a€ tre Moment 7 | will appeciite dev thtie Servicer P Last bug net least, the Comet might rot advocate iv me, explaining requirements Like Sahay a Claim itt advngots