No. 18-5839

James Frederick Rebmann v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2018-08-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-law drug-offense drug-offenses federal-sentencing federal-sentencing-guidelines felony-classification plain-reading possession-offenses prior-conviction prior-convictions sentencing-guidelines sixth-circuit statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Punishment
Latest Conference: 2018-10-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the plain reading of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines requires that the prior offense be more than simple possession

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The Federal Sentencing Guidelines require a base offense level of 43 if the defendant is “convicted under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A), (b)(1)(B), or (b)(1)(C)”, “the offense of conviction establishes that death or serious bodily injury resulted from the use of the substance”, and the defendant “ committed the offense after one or more prior convictions for a similar offense.” The Sixth Circuit has determined that this last phrase, “similar offense”, means any felony drug offense, including possession offenses. Does the plain reading of the Guideline require that the prior offense be more than simple possession? ii

Docket Entries

2018-10-09
Petition DENIED.
2018-09-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/5/2018.
2018-09-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-08-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 1, 2018)

Attorneys

James Rebmann
Kevin Michael SchadOffice of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent