Whether the Lower Courts violated any of these or other pertinent Laws, or rules, Overlooked, misapplied, neglected or made any vital legal errors in their Holdings and affirming of the District Court's Decision of this Petitioner Claims in any way including the issues that were to be addressed or improperly addressed by the lower Courts, the abandonment of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) and 504 Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (RA) claims and the dismissal for all the other claims involved?

QUESTION PRESENTED 24 C. F. R 982.316(a)(7) provide that Public Housing Authorities (PHA’s) MUST provide a larger bedroom unite size to accommodate an approved live in aide if needed as a reasonable accommodation. 42 U. S. C. sec. 3604 of the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and 3603 of the title and except as made exempt by sections 3603(b) and 3607 of the title makes clear that “It shall be unlawful to refuse to make Reasonable Accommodations in rules, policies, practices and services when such Accommodations may be necessary to , afford such a person the opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling” if that Accommodation Request is not responded to , then it is the same as a denial and on the other hand , if that request is denied then that Disabled Individual has the right to a due process hearing/appeal to assert their right and Entitlement to those benefits under the 14th : Amendment and 42 U.S. C 1983. The Question here is: . Whether the Lower Courts violated any of these or other pertinent Laws, or rules, Overlooked, misapplied, neglected or made any vital legal errors in their Holdings and affirming of the District Court’s Decision of this Petitioner Claims in any way including the issues that were to be addressed or improperly addressed by the lower Courts, the abandonment of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) and 504 Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (RA) claims and the dismissal for all the other claims involved?