No. 18-5981
Elizabeth Pastor v. Partnership for Children's Rights
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: article-78-proceeding civil-procedure civil-rights discovery discovery-rights due-process employer-threshold employment employment-discrimination judicial-transfer standing statutory-interpretation title-vii
Key Terms:
EmploymentDiscrimina
EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2019-01-11
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the lower court have denied full discovery for the purpose of violating Title VII?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : Should the Supreme Court have transferred the Article 78 to the Appellate Division without a hearing? ; Should the lower court have denied full discovery for the purpose of violating Title : VII? Especially when respondent claimed to have had less than 15 employees and certain documents were never reviewed regarding this?
Docket Entries
2019-01-14
Rehearing DENIED.
2018-12-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-11-30
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2018-11-05
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-04
Waiver of right of respondent Partnership for Children to respond filed.
2018-07-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2018)
Attorneys
Partnership for Children
Michael Frankel — Jackson Lewis, P.C., Respondent
Michael Frankel — Jackson Lewis, P.C., Respondent