No. 18-5981
Elizabeth Pastor v. Partnership for Children's Rights
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: article-78-proceeding civil-procedure civil-rights discovery discovery-rights due-process employer-threshold employment employment-discrimination judicial-transfer standing statutory-interpretation title-vii
Latest Conference:
2019-01-11
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should the Supreme Court have transferred the Article 78 to the Appellate Division without a hearing?
Should the lower court have denied full discovery for the purpose of violating Title VII? Especially when respondent claimed to have had less than 15 employees and certain documents were never reviewed regarding this?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the lower court have denied full discovery for the purpose of violating Title VII?
Docket Entries
2019-01-14
Rehearing DENIED.
2018-12-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.
2018-11-30
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2018-11-05
Petition DENIED.
2018-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.
2018-10-04
Waiver of right of respondent Partnership for Children to respond filed.
2018-07-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2018)
Attorneys
Elizabeth Pastor
Elizabeth Pastor — Petitioner
Partnership for Children
Michael Frankel — Jackson Lewis, P.C., Respondent