No. 18-5982
Todd F. Britton-Harr v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure guilty-plea ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel lee-v-united-states prejudice prejudice-standard reasonable-person sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Immigration
HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference:
2018-11-30
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Court's decision in Lee v. United States, 137 S.Ct. 1958 (2017) allow lower courts to require a showing that a 'reasonable person' would have proceeded to trial in order to be able to demonstrate prejudice in a case in which trial counsel provides deficient performance in connection with a guilty plea
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the Court’s decision in Lee v. United States, 137 S.Ct. 1958 (2017) allow lower courts to require a showing that a “reasonable person” would have proceeded to trial in order to be able to demonstrate prejudice in a case in which trial counsel provides deficient performance in connection with a guilty plea. il
Docket Entries
2018-12-03
Petition DENIED.
2018-11-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/30/2018.
2018-11-05
Petitioner complied with order of October 15, 2018.
2018-10-15
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 5, 2018, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2018-09-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.
2018-09-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-09-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 18, 2018)
2018-08-13
Application (18A155) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until September 18, 2018.
2018-08-07
Application (18A155) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 19, 2018 to September 18, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Todd F. Britton-Harr
F. Clinton Broden — Broden & Mickelsen, Petitioner
F. Clinton Broden — Broden & Mickelsen, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent