Whether a state court must constitutionally recognize and allow a defense in the form of testimony and/or other relevant evidence which disproves the requisite mens rea, and negates the element of specific intent, to be submitted to the trier of fact?

No question identified. : QUESTION[S] PRESENTED I WHETHER A STATE COURT MUST CONSTITUTIONALLY RECOGNIZE AND ALLOW A DEFENSE IN THE FORM OF TESTIMONY AND OR OTHER RELEVANT EVIDENCE WHICH DISPROVES THE REQUISITE MENS REA, AND NEGATES THE ELEMENT OF SPECIFIC INTENT, TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE TRIER OF FACT? Petitioner answers “yes” The State answers “no” i