Whether the Fifth Circuit erroneously interpreted and applied the law governing the timeliness of Title VII claims (racial discrimination and unlawful retaliation)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED | 1. Whether the Fifth Circuit erroneously interpreted and applied the law governing . the timeliness of Title VII claims (racial discrimination and unlawful retaliation) : in Delaware State Coll. v. Ricks, 449 U.S. 250, 252-53 (1980), when they ignored ‘. Respondents’ organized scheme of adverse employment actions that triggered . the well-defined Supreme Court’s continuing violation doctrine, and further erred by dismissing an uncontested Title VII claim (workplace harassment and hostility) : 2. Whether the Fifth Circuit’s discretion to waive Petitioner's arguments, failing to address the arguments relevant to Petitioner’s claims in reaching its decision, is justifiable under any law or court rules. ; . 7: 3. If the Fifth Circuit's position on Rule 54(b) Certification, as applied to this case ; (which is unwarranted), is in agreement with the position of other circuit courts and the Supreme Court. i