No. 18-6387
Spencer Bowens v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) 28 U.S.C. §2255(£)(3) 28 U.S.C. §2255(f)(3) extend to pre-Booker mandatory career-offender gu that has been newly recognized by the United Stat career-offender career-offender-guidelines collateral-review criminal-law criminal-procedure criminal-procedure,sentencing,retroactivity,collat Johnson-right johnson-v-united-states mandatory-sentencing retroactive-application retroactivity sentencing sentencing-guidelines Supreme-Court-precedent
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2018-11-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the right in Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) that has been newly recognized by the United States Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review, 28 U.S.C. §2255(f)(3), extend to pre-Booker mandatory career-offender guidelines
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ‘ Whether the right in Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), that has been newly recognized by the United States | Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review, 28 U.S.C. §2255(£)(3), extend to pre~-Booker mandatory career-offender guidelines. (i) . co 4 : ‘
Docket Entries
2018-11-19
Petition DENIED Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Ginsburg joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari: I dissent for the reasons set out in Brown v. United States, 586 U. S. ___ (2018) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
2018-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/16/2018.
2018-10-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-06-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 19, 2018)
Attorneys
Spencer Bowens
Spencer Bowens — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent