Where she jury was erroneously instrycted on (a) Murder as a natural and presbable consequence per peopie vs chiu 39 cal 4th $35 172 cad Rotr 3d 438 325 P.3d 972(2014) in conjunction with jurv instruction for(b) prewebitated wurder and (c) feloay murder,could the jury not have 2» convicted petitioer of ihe natural and provable conse ysence doctrine with out also finding that he was guilty of first degree murder

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ti]:Where she jury was erroneously instrycted on (a) Murder as a natural and presbable consequence per peopie vs chiu 39 cal 4th $35 172 cad Rotr 3d 438 325 P.3d 972(2014) in conjunction with jurv instruction for(b) prewebitated wurder and (c) feloay murder,could the jury not have 2» convicted petitioer of ihe natural and provable conse ysence doctrine with out also finding that he was guilty of first degree murder. i2].Whare respondent conceded the jury was erroneousiy given the naturai and . probabie ~onsequence instruction san it be said no matter what siaadard of prejudice applied to that chin error no prima facie case for relief can be made. [3! What standard of prejudice should be appiied to a chiu error people vs chiu (2914) 59 cal ach 155. f4|.in conjuncyio) with the natural and pcobeble onsegyence doctrine can both bodividual ps convicted of 1st degree mutizr where only one individual fired the weapon that caused death. Q