Is the availability of less-intrusive state wiretaps a material consideration for federal judges when evaluating Title III necessity under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2518(1)(c) and (3)(c)?

QUESTION PRESENTED Is the availability of less-intrusive state wiretaps a material consideration for federal judges when evaluating Title III necessity under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2518(1)(c) and (3)(c)? A. Are less-intrusive state wiretaps “other investigative procedures” under 18 U.S.C.§ 2518(1)(c)? B. Are less-intrusive state wiretaps “normal investigative procedures” under 18 U.S.C. § 2518(3)(c)? C. Where less-intrusive state wiretaps can fully expose the crime, are more-intrusive federal wiretaps still necessary? -ii