title-iii
16 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-6649 | Lesley Chappell Green v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | 2026-01-22 | Pending | Response WaivedIFP | communications-intercept court-sanctioning law-enforcement legal-constraints territorial-jurisdiction title-iii | Whether the Government met the intended constraints of Title III and state law incorporating Title III for a lawful interception of communications wit… |
| 25-6614 | In Re Joey Lamont Brunson | 2026-01-20 | Pending | IFP | due-process fifth-amendment rule-12 subject-matter-jurisdiction title-iii wiretap-evidence | 1. ) WAS THE DISTRICT COURT'S ASSERTION OF "SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION" VALID AFTER JURISDICTION WAS CHALLENGED UNDER F.R.CR.P. RULE 12(b)(2), REGARD… | |
| 25-851 | Ashley Grayson v. United States | Sixth Circuit | 2026-01-16 | Pending | circuit-split clean-hands-doctrine exclusionary-rule statutory-interpretation title-iii wiretap-law | Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (Title III) prohibits intentionally intercepting wire or oral communications or di… | |
| 25A603 | Gabriel L'Ambiance Ingram v. United States | Fourth Circuit | 2025-11-21 | Application | certiorari extension-of-time lower-courts pro-se title-iii wiretap | Question not identified. | |
| 24-6109 | Kevin Lewis and Otis Ponds v. United States | Tenth Circuit | 2024-12-10 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | criminal-procedure department-of-justice evidence-standard statutory-interpretation title-iii wiretap-authorization | What evidence must the government present in a wiretap application to establish that an authorized official approved the application? And if a defenda… |
| 23-678 | Pedro Pierluisi, Governor of Puerto Rico, et al. v. Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico | First Circuit | 2023-12-22 | Denied | bankruptcy-code close-nexus-test fiscal-plan oversight-board policy-dispute promesa related-to-jurisdiction subject-matter-jurisdiction title-iii Title-III-court | 1. Under the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act ("PROMESA") Section 306(a)(2), the Title III Court's subject-matter jurisdi… | |
| 23-353 | John Jones v. Lyudmyla Pyankovska | Ninth Circuit | 2023-10-03 | Denied | Response Waived | attorney-liability child-custody custody-proceeding first-amendment omnibus-crime-control omnibus-crime-control-and-safe-streets-act recording-liability recordings right-to-petition title-iii | Does the First Amendment to the United States Constitution's protection of the right to petition the government extend to insulate an attorney, presen… |
| 23-5396 | Antoine Clark v. United States | Third Circuit | 2023-08-21 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | criminal-procedure exigent-circumstances fourth-amendment law-enforcement probable-cause title-iii wiretap wiretap-law | Whether law enforcement's self-created exigent circumstances justify a Title III wiretap? |
| 22-638 | Mary La Riccia, et vir v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, et al. | Sixth Circuit | 2023-01-09 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (3) | ada americans-with-disabilities-act disability disability-rights doctor-patient-relationship employment medical-care medical-communication title-i title-iii | Can the restrictions placed on employees under Title I of the ADA be applied to an individual seeking medical care and treatment under Title III? |
| 21-6324 | Jesus Alfredo Ramirez v. United States | Ninth Circuit | 2021-11-18 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | 4th-amendment civil-procedure communication-interception criminal-procedure district-court evidence-suppression probable-cause title-iii wiretap | Whether the district court erred in authorizing a wiretap of Petitioner's communications under Title III and in failing to suppress the evidence inter… |
| 21-246 | Joseph Schneider v. New York | New York | 2021-08-20 | Denied | Response Waived | civil-rights due-process eavesdropping-warrant extraterritorial-jurisdiction federalism interstate-communications jurisdictional-limits state-judicial-authority state-sovereignty title-iii wiretapping | Do State Judges have authority under Title III's enabling statute to issue wiretap orders beyond their state borders? |
| 19-6841 | Adam Scott v. United States | Third Circuit | 2019-12-04 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | criminal-procedure delayed-sealing evidence-suppression exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment sealing statutory-compliance suppression surveillance-law title-iii title-iii-intercept unforeseen-emergency wiretap wiretap-procedure wiretap-suppression | Should a wiretap that was not sealed until 30 days after interception ended, and 21 days after the order expired, be suppressed where that delay was n… |
| 19-603 | Mark Silguero, et al. v. CSL Plasma, Incorporated | Fifth Circuit | 2019-11-07 | Denied | Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | americans-with-disabilities-act circuit-split disability-discrimination place-of-public-accommodation plasma-donation-center public-accommodation title-iii | Is a plasma donation center a 'place of public accommodation' subject to the requirements of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act? |
| 18-9398 | Ali Cisse v. New York | New York | 2019-05-23 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | 18-usc-2511 circuit-court-split circuit-split civil-rights consent fourth-amendment mitchell-v-wisconsin privacy privacy-rights statutory-interpretation title-iii wiretapping wiretapping-consent | Does knowledge of wiretapping establish 'consent' to wiretapping under 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(c)? |
| 18-6681 | Mark Anthony Rios, et al. v. United States | Ninth Circuit | 2018-11-14 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | 18-usc-2518 electronic-surveillance federal-surveillance federalism investigative-procedures necessity necessity-requirement privacy state-wiretaps title-iii wiretap-necessity wiretapping-surveillance | Is the availability of less-intrusive state wiretaps a material consideration for federal judges when evaluating Title III necessity under 18 U.S.C. §… |
| 18-5137 | Maurice Daniel v. Brooklyn Law School | New York | 2018-07-05 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | abuse-of-authority academic-due-process academic-performance americans-with-disabilities-act americans-with-disabilities-act-title-ii americans-with-disabilities-act-title-iii discrimination discriminatory-punishment due-process educational-discrimination mental-health mental-illness new-york-city-human-rights-law new-york-city-human-rights-law-section-8-107(4)(a) title-ii title-iii | Whether an academic dean's decision to bar a student from taking makeup exams and kick him out of school due to a mistaken belief that the student was… |