No. 23-5396
Antoine Clark v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure exigent-circumstances fourth-amendment law-enforcement probable-cause title-iii wiretap wiretap-law
Key Terms:
CriminalProcedure Privacy
CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-10-06
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether law enforcement's self-created exigent circumstances justify a Title III wiretap?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether this Court should set limits on whether law enforcement’s selfcreated exigent circumstances provide justification for a Title III wiretap?
Docket Entries
2023-10-10
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-07-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 20, 2023)
Attorneys
Antoine Clark
Joseph Schultz — Joseph Schultz, Esq., Petitioner
Joseph Schultz — Joseph Schultz, Esq., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent