No. 25-6649

Lesley Chappell Green v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2026-01-22
Status: Pending
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: communications-intercept court-sanctioning law-enforcement legal-constraints territorial-jurisdiction title-iii
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference: 2026-02-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Government met the intended constraints of Title III and state law for a lawful interception of communications when it failed to show the intercepted communications were acquired within the territorial jurisdiction of the sanctioning court

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

is: Whether the Government met the intended constraints of Title III and state law incorporating Title III for a lawful intercept ion of communications within the territorial jurisdi ction of the sanctioning court , when it failed to show the intercepted communications were, in actual fact, acquire d within the territorial jurisdiction and did show it first acted upon intercepted communications outside the territorial jurisdiction , by merely showing the communications were first listen ed to within the territorial jurisdiction ? ii INTERESTED PARTIES Pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 14.1(b)(i), Mr. GREEN submits that there are no

Docket Entries

2026-01-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/20/2026.
2026-01-26
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2026-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2026-01-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 23, 2026)

Attorneys

Lesley C. Green
Michael Eric EberhardtLaw Offices Of M. Eric Eberhardt, Petitioner
Michael Eric EberhardtLaw Offices Of M. Eric Eberhardt, Petitioner
Michael Eric EberhardtLaw Offices Of M. Eric Eberhardt, Petitioner
United States
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent