Whether the Government met the intended constraints of Title III and state law incorporating Title III for a lawful interception of communications within the territorial jurisdiction of the sanctioning court, when it failed to show the intercepted communications were, in actual fact, acquired within the territorial jurisdiction and did show it first acted upon intercepted communications outside the territorial jurisdiction, by merely showing the communications were first listened to within the territorial jurisdiction?

Whether the Government met the intended constraints of Title III and state law for a lawful interception of communications when it failed to show the intercepted communications were acquired within the territorial jurisdiction of the sanctioning court