Does the Petitioner have the right to sue under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, even after he has received his letter of right to sue?

Questions Presented for Review Petitioner filed an early lawsuit for employment discrimination in 2017. The District Court agreed that Petitioner never received the Magistrate orders, therefore, Petitioner filed another same suit on July 5, 2017, then filed an amendment suit thereto of the same in January and February 2018. 1) Does the Petitioner have the right to sue under Title VII of the Civil Rights act of 1964, even after he has received his letter of right to sue on June 18, 2018. 2) Does the Petitioner have the right to sue for employment discrimination under the 42 U.S.C. 1981.706,77’B, 706(G)_ within his class of Former employment with over 600 employees of all race etc at Former Medtronic, New Cardinal? Race discrimination, wrongful termination, retaliation, hostile work environments etc..., termination process, procedures etc... 3) Does the U.S. District Court, for Southern District of Georgia, Augusta Division, J. Randall Hall, Chief Judge is beyond the law, and disregards F.R.C.P. and F.R.C.P. 8 (), 60 B etc. that within 30 days of filing a complaint, a defendant must respond or the shall win recovery in complaint. The Defendants never responded nor submitted reasons why they did not respond, so Petitioners Motion for Contempt of Court, November 28,2017, should be granted. He abused his authority. 4) Have the below Courts, U.S. District Court Judge Magistrate and Chief Judge herein abuse their authority in granting IFPIn Forma Pauperis status on November 6 ,2017, but when he appealed to the U,S, 11" Circuit of Appeal they denied hi, the IFP status, even though he showed unemployment status The Court of Appeals denied Petitioner, Plaintiff, Appellant IFP — Informa Pauperis too, after he showed unemployment status as well, July 31, 2018, by Stanley Marcus, U.S. Circuit Court Judge. He was also denied EN-BANC process and all records be submitted to their court from the district court and for as , Attorney-Attorney to assist him. Have they abused their authority and the case should be remanded back to District Court, with another Chief Judge besides J. Randall Hall as the overseer. , . p “s The Parties Chief Judge, J. Randall Hall, U.S. District Court; Southern District of Georgia, Augusta Division : Judge Stanley Marcus, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit DefendantsKelly Speight, David Cadden, Beth Love, CV.117-118, U.S. District Court, Georgia, Augusta Division Petitioner — U.S. Supreme Court Eric Lawson Magistrate Judge Brian Kepps, U.S. District Court, Southern District, Augusta Division 2