Should this court resolve the split between the Fourth and Eleventh Circuit about the probity of the fact that a vehicle is a rental in the reasonable suspicion calculation?

Question Presented Should this court resolve the split between the Fourth and Eleventh Circuit about the probity of the fact that a vehicle is a rental in the reasonable suspicion calculation? Compare United States v. Smith, 799 F.2d 704, 707 (11th Cir. 1986) (rental in a ‘drug corridor’ insufficient to create reasonable suspicion); United States v. Bowman, 884 F.3d 200 (4th Cir. 2018) (following the Eleventh Circuit), with United States v. Camran, No. 17-50404, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 21041 (9th Cir. July 30, 2018) (unpublished) (rental status significant in reasonable suspicion determination).