Clifton Stanley Diaz, Jr. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit erred in denying the plaintiff's request for monetary damages and reinstatement to his job
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED US. COURT OF RADEALS FOL TINE OC. crauiT DP NOT REPO To TNE Morun SEEKS Moaverney DamACEL Because THE Coutt was Lengewin’ THe O€PEL (CP Five pays clr Antic 7, 0 (S The PlamTiff Astin’ Fut Ws Joo Gack? DC Lbs Satis That iF THE Covet (6voees THE mnetien | it must PLACE A Say ON Ary Scnepaltp mori, W port Ppatit’ APPEAL ° ‘ € 0.6. 80 1F THE US. CvUkT OF pppens Pot TH “epautt pinot CeSfor? To THE moti s €tHNe 6 Mont tay pamaets, (5 4h € PLAINTIFF A SEIN Kore ths FoR GACK. “ = GN ORES TN oc ww Sretes THAT IF THE COUT | ick STI OM fine} Serleau ten motion, (T muse F 7, NCE protiow, the Pramstite er TTP To BacKfy Ano WS Job BAcK!